msangel Posted May 6, 2013 Posted May 6, 2013 subj.AFA .pdn is format for working project. Sometimes to some elements in workspace need to add extra metadata(ex.: font style and size, another example - in case of color with alpha - thectly color definition, in some cases - describe object relation.)All this stuff exist in adobe reader. All what need - copy functionality to Paint.NET. Quote
pdnnoob Posted May 6, 2013 Posted May 6, 2013 Paint.net is a raster image editor. There is no "text" once you commit your text to the image. Everything is pixels. That said, if you think about it, annotations would be irrelevant to the program. Quote No, Paint.NET is not spyware...but, installing it is an IQ test. ~BoltBait Blend modes are like the filling in your sandwich. It's the filling that can change your experience of the sandwich. ~Ego Eram Reputo
Ego Eram Reputo Posted May 6, 2013 Posted May 6, 2013 I use the layer name to record details like Font, size, colors etc..., Quote ebook: Mastering Paint.NET | resources: Plugin Index | Stereogram Tut | proud supporter of Codelab plugins: EER's Plugin Pack | Planetoid | StickMan | WhichSymbol+ | Dr Scott's Markup Renderer | CSV Filetype | dwarf horde plugins: Plugin Browser | ShapeMaker
msangel Posted May 7, 2013 Author Posted May 7, 2013 (edited) For keeping metadata is no difference is this raster or vector file. .pdn is workspace file. It already contain some metadata. I am talking, than it will be useful to keep user-defined metadata(texts, arrows), linked to some position on layer. This data is not a part of picture, but it need sometime to describe some detail on region, without affecting image. Like an comment to cell data in spreadsheet. Like a highlight text in pdf. It's not affect the original data - cell contend, pdf document, image. It's just describe it. Creating a hidden layer with this all stuff as picture is not so practical - it is not possible to copy text from there, change it simply, move, etc. And not so simply to describe detail for each layer. Edited May 7, 2013 by msangel Quote
Rick Brewster Posted May 7, 2013 Posted May 7, 2013 Creating a hidden layer with this all stuff as picture is not so practical And adding all this stuff as a completely separate editing and rendering engine is practical? The engineering cost for what you're asking for is enormous. Sorry buddy, not gonna happen. This is what layers are for. Quote The Paint.NET Blog: https://blog.getpaint.net/ Donations are always appreciated! https://www.getpaint.net/donate.html
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.