Mike Ryan

I posted about this in the Pictorium a few days ago. Mine was a little bit more drawn out, but better something than nothing. I completely agree with seperating it. Second, deviantArt is great, but this community is better imo. To be able to post pdn only pictures to pdn only users and get pdn only feedback is the best imo.

You are right, you did. For some reason I always manage to get the two of you confused But as your sig says...

no, it works fine here. is should be http://alpha.search.wikia.com

There is no way to do this. Although using the new selection method "By Size" it is very easy to accomplish this simply using coordinates and copy and paste. As for saving each layer seperate, once again you have to use a work around. As Rick Brewster said himself, if you want a truly proffesional graphics editor, I must point you to Photoshop. Edit2: David.Atwell beat me to the punch :?

Hello! New sig and avatar. Critisism appreciated

Someone, it more looks like ice text, so I think maybe a little Splinter blur will give it a powdery snow like effect

This is my last post for today, as I have to go off to school. This is just a small concept. and yes I know I misspelled the word Pictorium :oops:

At Oma: I also partially described splitting it by Genres. Have a Pictorium for Abstract, and for Realism, and for Works in Progress. Each would also have an individual discussion thread, so that each Pictorium is pure work, not talk. I also like your idea, where mods would select the best from the week, the only problem is that is asking for a lot of work on a mods job

learn something new everyday even if it is from pyro

at least a few rule revisions to help clean up the clutter would be nice.

My post count may say otherwise, but I have been a member of this forum for quite a while. I just don’t like to respond much until lately. Anyways, I want the forum moderators and/ or Rick to consider reorganizing the Pictorium. It has become cluttered with Clouds and Polar Inversions, along with useless introductions. I think that the Pictorium should be reorganized to where it is a topic underneath Paint.net General Discussion. Within this topic is a place for Introduction Artwork, Introduction Discussion, Intermediate Artwork, Intermediate Discussion, Advanced Artwork, and Advanced Discussion. Other thoughts and perhaps easier possibilities would be dividing the pictorium into genres of artwork, ranging from realism to abstract, and then focusing the chatter into a separate related topic. I have always thought of the Pictorium as a showcase, like a museum or gallery, and the pollution within it has made it similar to the Off Topic. It should not be a hotbed for plug-in and tutorial requests, nor introductions. The Introducing... Thread is for introductions, and separate topics should be created for plug-in and tutorial requests. Simply, let us cleanup our act in the Pictorium. Let us have a Green Pictorium. Thank you for your time to read my post, I hope you take it into consideration.

I must have not understood what you are asking for. You are asking for complete transparency in a layer, right?

If it is truly 100% transparent, it should not be happening. Unless you are working with multiple errors, and you are flattening them, you will have problems with the transparency.I would try this tool, instead of adjusting transparency in the Layer Properties. You shouldnt run into this problem again. http://paintdotnet.forumer.com/viewtopic.php?t=3285

well if you ever find yourself in need of a tester let me know, I will be more than glad to find those nasty bugs for you 8)

I agree. Vista = bloody potato. Anywho, a very related question. In an interview with Rick, they do a quick demo of pdn V2.?? and it shows a pen tool, in which the pixel width increased or decreased based on spead and curvature. Was this brush option tossed in some release, and if so why? Then again, that demo could easily have been done on a tablet, but nothing was said about a tablet. I am just wondering...

When will we see the next version?

If you use the Fill tool or Paintbrush tool, you will notice in the upper toolbar there is a dropdown box entitled "Fill". I believe you will be able to find the pattern underneath, in which the outline and the fill of the pattern is determined by your Primary and Secondary color. Just a suggestion.

I agree, more precision can be obtained. but if you notice in the upper right there are coordinates that allow you to know where your mouse and/ or control points are. This allows for the most precision and accuracy in the Curves+ plugin, along with the regular Curves.

:oops: Sorry for the misconception. When I refered to CcMmYK, I wasnt refering to the printing process, merely the color control. If Curves+ could change dark cyan and light cyan, along with dark magenta and light magenta instead of just CMYK, it would allow more precision over the color of the image you are working on. For instance, bringing out the darker magenta and cyan in an image, instead of the color itself, could allow for more possibilities with image editing. (plus we would have something that as far as I know photoshop doesnt )

Hello, I usually dont ask for much when it comes to plugins, but lately I have been reading a lot about color variation, and I am simply asking for CcMmYK support in Curves+. It is not a "must have" but simply a want.

Great plugin! (sorry it took me awhile to thankyou for the 3.20 support

My HUGE suggestion would be using the Alpha mask plugin. It lets you remove the white and/ or black out of an image.

The planet in the background could use a little work, along with the water in that hole. Of course, I am just being extremely nit picky because I am jelous on how you used the two programs to create something that good. :wink:

That took me about ten minutes, and of course need a lot more work. I just used edge detect and the line/ curve tool with the paintbrush and gradients.

I believe you are refering to the smudge tool, and either way it wouldnt be until v4.0 with custom brushes.