penpen Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 (edited) Bicubic resample too slow XnConvert was also resize faster than Paint.NET resample performance other commercial software(Bicubic) >highest performance god-wall> XnConvert >high performance freeware-wall> Paint.NET(Bicubic) >low performance freeware-wall(single-thread)> other freeware example http://hfgp2.hf.funp...elp/noise/0.png (image from http://forums.getpaint.net/index...plugin/) mspaint - 7 sec/1T 5208x4856 (pre-resize original>400%>200%) resize to 200% XnConvert - 8 sec/8T 5208x4856 jpg to 12416x9712 bmp (default) Paint.NET - 40 sec/8T original resize to 1600% (Bicubic) 5208x4856 (pre-resize original>800%) resize to 200% (Bicubic) Paint.NET v3.5.10 Win7 x64 sp1, .net 3.5.1 Bulldozer 8-Core, 1.4GHz (downclock) Edited July 28, 2012 by penpen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Brewster Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 Ok so you invented some benchmarks and it was slower. So what? Is there some purpose to this? Quote The Paint.NET Blog: https://blog.getpaint.net/ Donations are always appreciated! https://www.getpaint.net/donate.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwertyuu Posted July 29, 2012 Share Posted July 29, 2012 Took 8 seconds here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim100361 Posted July 29, 2012 Share Posted July 29, 2012 Maybe he was using some Chinese freeware. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ego Eram Reputo Posted July 29, 2012 Share Posted July 29, 2012 No need to diss the Chinese! Let's just presume that it was sub-optimal software Quote ebook: Mastering Paint.NET | resources: Plugin Index | Stereogram Tut | proud supporter of Codelab plugins: EER's Plugin Pack | Planetoid | StickMan | WhichSymbol+ | Dr Scott's Markup Renderer | CSV Filetype | dwarf horde plugins: Plugin Browser | ShapeMaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim100361 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 No need to diss the Chinese! LMAO, don't jump to conclusions. I was inferring that the Chinese freeware may have been far more superior than what qwertyuu may have used. ...you believe me don't you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penpen Posted July 30, 2012 Author Share Posted July 30, 2012 (edited) 8Thread(Paint.NET 40s) slower than 1Thread(Ralpha 2s), The low-efficiency is not program? Ralpha 8 sec/1T (2s openfile<load中>/ 2s resizing<変換中>/ 4s savefile<出力中>/ estimate time) 5208x4856 jpg resize to 200% jpg (Bicubic) Ralpha (Japanese UI only /ANSI/non-unicode) http://nilposoft.info/ralpha/ Ralpha Plus (payware) Ralpha and mini version (freeware for private) XnConvert http://www.xnconvert.com/ Paint.NET v3.5.10 Win7 x64 sp1, .net 3.5.1 Bulldozer 8-Core, 1.4GHz (downclock) Edited July 30, 2012 by penpen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.