Deborah

That looks really nice.

You should be able to do this by: 1. select the part you want in colour with the magic wand 2. Go Edit > Invert Selection (Ctrl+I) 3. Go Adjustments > Black and White (Ctrl+ Shift+G)

no problem

Yup - It now shows up for me with the proper transparency. I don't know when the filter is executed, but here's the MSDN page for it: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms532969.aspx

Your image seems to be at resource/dominoes.png. Try (src=resource/dominoes.png) I tried that in the IE DOM Explorer and it worked fine.

It can be quite picky about the path to the image - I had a problem when I had a / in front. I have IE6 installed. If you want to post a link, I can check it. Edit: I found a plugin for IE - I haven't gotten it to work yet, but it seems to parse through the page/css and insert the same filter tag I'm using - cool

If you are comfortable using CSS, there's a filter you can use in IE6 that will display a png with the proper variable transparency: filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(src=imagepath/yourImage.png) This filter works only in IE and puts the png in a special layer between the foreground and background. It must be put onto a containing tag with a height and/or width. To use it, add this code to your page in place of an tag. Change imagePath/yourImage.png to your image Change the height and width to the height and width of your image. .pngImage1 { background-image: url(imagepath/yourImage.png); height: 500px; width:500px; } /* IE 6 only */ *html .pngImage1 { background-image: none; filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(src=imagepath/yourImage.png); }

Darn, well I tried... I was going for "This is amazing". What would be the translation for that? (Wishing I knew any kanji so I wouldn't look like an idiot )

Wow, this is amazing. Thank you MTK. Thank you Ash. ワウã

I'd like to second the vote for #1. I tend to zoom in a lot to fix small details and then zoom back to 100% to see what it looks like. I end up zooming back to somewhere between 95-107%, but not 100%. This puts any text in the image out of whack and I find it extremely annoying. Deb (Love the program in general though.)

I'd like to second the vote for #1. I tend to zoom in a lot to fix small details and then zoom back to 100% to see what it looks like. I end up zooming back to somewhere between 95-107%, but not 100%. This puts any text in the image out of whack and I find it extremely annoying. Deb (Love the program in general though.)