tobibeer Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Today I wished for a simple option that would allow to mask all non-selected pixels with any of the following: Black White FG-Color BG-Color Custom-Color Especially when croping rectangular sections this would give a cleaner impression on what the result actually looks like. This could be a single dropdown-button, integrated into the options-toolbar for selection-mode. Also, is there a chance that in the (near) furure, selections support alpha-masks, so that instead of a pixel being either selected or not, one had an option to use certain smoothing gradients together with the standard selection tools? Or have I been missing sth. and there's a plugin that already does apply these kind of "smooth edges" in order to cut or copy a selection. Sorry, if I wasn't quite using proper terminology. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0(-.-)0 Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 You could crop to selection and then undo... Quote - Any thoughts? - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sozo Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 To answer your second question, I don't know all of Rick's plans for developing Paint.NET, but smooth selections isn't in Rick's popular feature requests. I think it should be though, I know it has been requested in the past. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarkut Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 tobibeer, I recognize that you would prefer these to be features of Paint.NET. ================================================ For anyone interested in work-arounds - To have the area outside the selection be masked while positioning to crop: First decide on an area that you know will be excluded from the crop. Make a new layer and fill it with white. (Or whatever color you prefer) Make a tiny Rectangular selection in the area to be excluded and press Delete. Magic Wand inside the deleted rectangle, then activate the Move Selected Pixels tool. You can move the selection, resize it, and change its aspect ratio, while the area outside the selection remains blocked from view. When it looks right - Crop to Selection. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobibeer Posted February 17, 2010 Author Share Posted February 17, 2010 That's a cool technique. Simple work-arounds aren't the worst idea after all. It seems, though, that resizing and moving a selection is more ressource-intensive than making one. Also, am I missing something or does it actually make more sense to delete that rectange (or other) WITHIN the area which you want to keep? Tobias. tobibeer,For anyone interested in work-arounds - To have the area outside the selection be masked while positioning to crop: First decide on an area that you know will be excluded from the crop. Make a new layer and fill it with white. (Or whatever color you prefer) Make a tiny Rectangular selection in the area to be excluded and press Delete. Magic Wand inside the deleted rectangle, the activate the Move Selected Pixels tool. You can move the selection, resize it, and change its aspect ratio, while the area outside the selection remains blocked from view. When it looks right - Crop to Selection. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarkut Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 does it actually make more sense to delete that rectange (or other) WITHIN the area which you want to keep? Yes, you are quite right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobibeer Posted February 17, 2010 Author Share Posted February 17, 2010 You could crop to selection and then undo... I know... but that's the kind of click'n'wait I was hoping to avoid, especially with pixel intensive images. Since a certain update - though I couldn't tell since when, I believe it came with some dotNET Update or the last major update of pdn - performance of (many) basic actions seems to have dropped rather drastically. So, maybe I'm actually having a performace issue here, which of course would improve if I got to upgrade my single-core 2GHZ to something more recent / decent. Just to give you an idea, cropping a 3648x2736 image to let's say 3000x2000 easily takes 10 seconds and so does the undo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0(-.-)0 Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Aah. I understand. Quote - Any thoughts? - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.