You can deride the person's comment to deflect the reality of what they're saying but it doesn't detract from the truth of their statement. While you're adding all these whiz-bang features that few people will use (like pressure sensitivity), you've long-neglected a basic need of even the most mundane graphic arts tool: robust text handling. At this point, your text handling still lags behind even the most baseline of all graphics programs, Microsoft Paint. That's not a criticism, it's pointing out reality, a reality you obviously don't want to hear. As for entitled, if you weren't asking for money, I could see that being the case. But now that you're charging for the program or asking for donations, people should be able to point out flaws and deficiencies without being harangued. Right now, I intensively use Microsoft Paint, Adobe Photoshop, GIMP, Paint.Net and Inkscape depending on the system I'm on and the complexity of the task at hand but I find myself using Paint.Net less and less due to the frustration of trying to kludge around its archaic text capabilities. Why you've neglected this most basic feature for so long is beyond me but it has tainted an otherwise great program. Take that criticism as you will but it is not meant to demean but to reinforce the need for better text handling if you wish your program to stay competitive with like offerings