• Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

  1. Probably have to download the update and reinstall, upon reinstall of update should be able to get repair option. modify, or install. I think sometimes it has version of Framework reading config issue....Like given when installing older versions, i needed to install and older framework. And i didnt need too. Was weird. Dont think have the latest. Which might be 4.0 or so, idk. 2 i think remembering correctly is the last ive left off on....maybe 3-3.5. Sometimes i think apps or programs that require the need of whatever updates grab them for themselves, if that makes any sense. Cause you usually have to download additional updates but its for newer programs.
  2. Yea, most programs probably do use all 2G of memory at once, and having the program then take what you are saving to hard drive save and free up memory within your memory, is probably limited to how applications you have running. And given that the CPU needs to process whats running while, storing to drive and ram at the same time while also taking any inputs. Cause even though you have say 2G run, and maybe even a dual core 1.2ghz process. Your bit rate is probably half to say per hertz. Im not sure excatly. Given that Netbooks probably dont run off 110volts they might when they arent pluggged in, and might even when they are plugged in. Might be even 60 volts. or 120, im not sure. There some numbers in there of course. But when you are talking like not even using 100mb within just 1g of 2. Right, Then you are getting capped maybe to a multipler of ram with CPU processing. Like if the Cache of 1mb you might be at a factor of like 10. So anyone program can run 10mb of emeory from the process at a time within each block or segmwnt of storage to the memory and drive. Seems like you just need to uncap something or find something that isnt installed to do so. Cause it would be fairly easy program to run a GB out of Ram and Hard Drive space per use of any application within just one use. Usually working with that amount of images at a time. I myself dont like to turn off my machine. I usually dont work with that many images but more of the same copy of one. Either way, put the same kind work in each time. Doesnt take very long or much to do. Might increase your virtual memory if you can, usually is set pretty low, to allow more apps to run at once if possible. Cause at one point you just have 2gs of memory to work at a time per session of real time use. 2gs is still nice to have and use, but is getting kinda outdated with "modern" use of applications and programs, internet use even. Especially with additional software processing a lot of times. I dont know if that helps any or not. You might have to save images and load them in a different program just for the occasions.
  3. As long as you have a printer hooked up and config with your computer, you should be fine, cause the program should run off defult, unless you like have more then one computer, or you have to connect to one through a network or something. Have to dail-in or what not. The Wizard comes up mainly seems like to me anyways, is if the program doesnt recognize that it has a printer hooked up to it. Cause the Paint program, should have a printer setup of print within its options for no need of wizard. Wizard should come up most on first intial installs and prints, and thats it if that.
  4. Right, k..got older uninstalled right...found version left off on which is 3.0 not 2.0. My mistake. What other versions that was in use after 3.0 till now i dont know. Finding out now. All versions downloaded though now install and uninstall as needed. 2.1 and 2.6 still give me problems though which is weird cause i was using 2.6 before i was posting in the forums as of late, but yet still was using a version higher earlier in use. which was 3.0. I cant find the say newer versions on disc anywhere so far, so downloading the newer version didnt look right. Downloaded newer older versions, and then installed latest version and all seems good. Just the part of missing older new version for use now until post in forum for version features, and uninstalling, installing issues. Cause i got older files saved with paint.net that are newer version files. How i got 2.6 idk. Just making sure that something is right at least. Found the roadmap, so version info not needed. Just gotta find maybe what plugins i was using. Have had to reformat and etc since then, Had gotten a virus at one time i think, but did delete it and etc, and making sure what files are what to a small point. So far not awhole lot has changed. In terms of websites, but whats the versions of downloads for programs. The newest version didnt seem to work right. Removing older versions didnt wanna work, and installing the latest didnt either. But got most if not all that fixed. Trying to get around maybe to a post in plugins for a bit but kinda waiting and checking a few things. Thanks though...
  5. The older versions of installs with get removed from newer install but the reinstall of older versions from newer installs of the newer versions removes features from the previous versions. And some versions dont have uninstaller with them. Or installer on one. All worked until i downloaded the latest version. Even if you dont have the previous version for downloads, can there be a way to at least be able to get an installer package for the program for older versions?? And uninstaller packages. The older version of install i was using doesnt have the install package with it or uninstall. Doesnt make sense of course, why im posting. Edit: Removed link to older versions, which isn't permitted. Here the website i downloaded some older versions at. I downloaded i think 4, but i had only missed the intial release of paint.net, so version 2.1 is where i had started but didnt have anything higher then 3....least before the last 1yr maybe 2. The image of the Car was a big association of the program. The image for the program in relation is no different really then the one then, but maybe a shade of lighter or darker. Program features and design is the same, but install lately of it is weird. Only the newer versions contain the same features for some reason. Cause you could do 3d boxes and spheres i think with paint.net. I downloaded i think few plugins then for 3d. Not the greatest 3d program but useful if wanting to put the work in. Otherwise it was just having a bunch of programs for different 3d aspects. Im not for sure though now specifically, but outside that fact is still other features. Im just wanting to make sure that either isnt bogus software, free or not. Otherwise might of installed to quickly from different versions, got most to work, but still issues. I'll still work with them though. Also plugin accesss is different, think the site has been updated to say since i had used paint.net last. 2.0 think was a big thing for paint.net, and i had missed it. Only thing i remember most. Since then i dont know. I'd say the installers and uninstalers basically would be the same without too much differences if any at all. But i dont know. The differences from first use and latest i dont know what the bigger of all differences are suppose to be. I'll check though to make sure. Probably should search the forum for a version compariosn chart or something maybe.
  6. I had always seen Macs or Apples the same way, more into like graphic designing and etc. Idk why either. Otherwise might be better getting a tablet for making images and etc. Might be just an old tech trend of use still in some trends today. Just kinda varies perhaps in what universities, or schools, or even group builds use for business or projects. Idk, but is weird though. Now more like if you can find the program for whatever OS you fairly covered for paint and/or images use. External devices might vary from time to time. Apple has iphones and such. Ipads. Probably more design uses on the move then actual taking each pixel and making as whatever. Idk. Is interesting though, but of all expensive to some terms of things, seeing that one OS and such more useful for one type of digital media then another. Though all types or version are fairly user frinedly to have access for different means music, video, pictures, images, applications/programs and games. Idk, i thought about the same way though.
  7. Well given that Paint.net latest downloads are as good as previous ones, when will the newer versions of paint.net have the features in previous versions? Given of course that the previous versions have been released at some time and the work involved has already been done, with whats not in the latest versions what could be expected in the newer releases? Honestly sometimes i think its and industry trend but hey, with it though is still the thought of whats coming out next in the newer releases, even though previous versions dont have much room for comparison on this one of course, since the latest download isnt like any of them. Has there been any interest in a newer release? I hadnt really used my computer for awhile and getting back around to things has made a download of the new versions a need to say. Given Paint.net has something different in terms of use against any of paint program and the like and visa-versa. And of it is the lose of better features of use with the program in terms of where or what other paint programs are or is at. Paint is still nice, but theres a break away, and using Photoshop has limits, and Gimp is failry more complex i think in use from using paint, paint.net, and a photoshop mixture. Others seem more niche, but still have overall use with in them. But all of least is the idea of paint.net. Rather it was suppose to be a replacement for paint, i dont know, but seemed more geared of those directions with what it had to offer for use. So, are there any ideas or thoughts for newer releases anytime soon? And with that will there be any archiving of the current releases? Archiving seems to be the topic honestly of late of any peice of software, why we may never really know of course, but since at least maybe the idea is up there might be able to have some room of work or interest of it. Since of that at least is the idea of being able to download it elsewhere if possible, maybe maybe not, rather archiving is something of actual interest is always the question more then anything i think, since its seems none existent here. Probably has a price tag of course and of it given a free download basically for the times of software releases, as i had said before, cant really complain much honestly. I just had a bunch of computer problems where getting rid of some programs of more use then not. But thats always the case it seems. And i dnt think i can say im the only one of interest of the ideas either or thoughts of newer versions of release of paint.net or any program really. Given the use of older ones is in contest. Either way leaves room for some complaint one form or another. Some info might be nice, and might be somewhere on the website honestly. But of it at least is still the time taken trying to work with what isnt there and trying to find out why without knowing the difference between then, which is fine, but hasnt really been very useful in terms of where the interest is. But with what has been done is been a lot and very useful. And anything of use is always ideas of interest. Updates and some reasoning to them is better part. And of all is been put to a point, other then whats not there though, which lacks in comparison but does work with what has been said. So no complaints really there from what i could tell and read of. So, somehere in there is a thanks but then not to some point, but still can say it really. Either way, of anything by now more then nothing is known on anyone part, right? Think its called progress sometimes, but it probably varies of some section 8 article in some text. This post i think was put better then the last. Not really going for an English Major either every time i post . You could probably update your whole site and release two new versions before anything like that is done. When what can be put down is a lot simpler and smaller really. In terms of some convo maybe, idk. Not trying to be too literal or techincal of anything given the difference in topic are probably some what evident. I moight be slightly short sided given, who actually made the program and who responding, or those in work the program and site, might be two different things, but i try to leave to small justice to place of post and topic of website. Most is probably rambling and i dont know it.
  8. I was wondering if there was any older version of paint.net open for download. The newer version i hadnt quite used for awhile and given that its an additional program of use from the original paint program to additional features of use, i was just wondering where those had went to in the newer versions and if any continued develpoment of progress will be put into those areas. Since the newer versions seem to be a backwards direction from the older paint.net versions. Ive read the other posts but known really state much of anything to why at least any features of the older versions let alone the older version are no longer open for use or download. Even though it is a free program, you are taking and given on a basis of commercial means. If you are going to make a program and offer it as a better use of such given what is considered standard of software applications and within its development of additional uses of software and wanting to compliment to the times of digital works in terms of paint and manipulation. You should maintain at least software releases the same. Without the manipulation. Just cause of one thing doesnt mean another. If the version isnt going to work, then having a new one is pointless. Its nice to say at least its free, but everything in use is basically something in means of pay. Which works both ways of course given reasoning of either one direction. So of it at least you'd at least think user friendly of features be able to be download which a lot are with the program. Or used to be, not anymore from what i can tell. But of that also, at least though again what comes with the newer versions, makes hardly anything newer of them. And how you or whom ever can have a stated site of newer version for download is about anyone guess. Having somthing stated as something lesser is better then something newer cause at least with whats stated it is as it is. Even without fine print. Here fine print might be the case but in most of what isnt in fine print is stated fairly clearly. But of all i was just wondering more then anything. For a free paint program it isnt all that bad, for it does cover some simple ideas and some complex ones, but the older versions were better. Newer might not mean better, but its not even stated here to allow to be said so. Well, can of course. Some feedback would be nice, but of this though, with it being something free isnt much room to complain.