Jump to content

wontstoptalkinga

Members
  • Posts

    74
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by wontstoptalkinga

  1. This will probably be considered a spam-post, or filler post for no reason, but I am sorry to set everyone off in my last post. I was just excited to make my first picture in Paint.Net, and yeah, it is probably the most pathetic picture you have ever seen. So let's hear about how everyone hates it!

    Edit: I mean the "Can anyone make something like this..." post.

  2. Ok, here is a test for me and a question for you. I am about to post a quick 5 min picture I made with a mostly transparant background, and see what happens. This has been done a trillion times on this site, but for some reason I don't think it works for me. (And I am useing Firefox, not IE. I hear transparancy doesn't work for IE.) Here is my semitransparant picture:

    anotherandyjpegnk5.jpg.

    Did it work? If not, why not?

    Edit: See, darnet, it didn't work. The black should no be there and the green should be semitransparant. There should also be a guassian blur on the layer with the green crescent thing. Why does it work for you and not me?

  3. The only tool that Paint.Net needs right now that I can think of is the Magic Lasso. For those who don't know, you use it like the Lasso, but it wraps automaticly around color changes, which would be set by the Tolerance. It would work great! With it you could perfectly crop a person, even if they wear a blue shirt, red pants, and a green hat. The Magic Wand couldn't do that, because it rely's on a specific color. The Magic Lasso automaticly snaps to the edge of where one color stops and another begins. It's just what most people who use Paint.Net need. Who agrees? I've used the Magic Lasso tool on other programs before, and I think it's what Paint.Net. needs.

  4. yo 1millionlayersman don't say things like that :S rubbery has done almost the same as u using less layers, that means his job is more efficient that yours right? cuz he did almost the same with much less work.. and don't talk about your picture as a masterpiece.. it's not that good.. it's ok to feel proud about something you did, just don't get too cocky k? :) sry if i offend you, that's not my purpose.

    I know exactly what you mean. And yes, I did use 13_15_4_14_1_18's starfield tutorial as the background. But I forgot about it! Sorry, but I am giving you full credit for that. I can't tell you how sorry I am I forgot! what I was doing was trying to explain that the image I made was not made with the original "God's Eye". Once again, sorry!

  5. Yeah, and sorry it got sloppy at the end. I was really in need of room. Maybe is hould have just made it a little bit bigger, even though that would kinda break the rules. I wonder if I would have been aloud to do that. If I am, I'll go back and make it a little bigger. And maybe fix some grammer errors! I made the errors because I was in a hurry. I'll fix them later.

×
×
  • Create New...