Jump to content

aradke

Newbies
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by aradke

  1. At this point it sounds like 2.6 is not too far off. I would be more than happy to lay the .mst issue to rest for now if I knew that 2.6 would ship with suitable defaults within the stock msi except for one thing; dotnet 2. I'm sure there are a tonne of reasons for moving from 1.1 to 2.0 but at this point in time Paint.net would be the only application within our organistion that would require it. For this reason I would be expecting to stay with 2.5 for some time and I think a lot of other organisation's would be in a similar position. As such I think that it is a very important that a suitable .mst (or possibly a modified .msi) is published.
  2. So at the end of this process do we have a group of settings for an mst that we all agree on? If so can we create an mst that can be made available for download on the Paint.NET website?
  3. Hi, Is there any chance that you could either post your MST or open it in Orca and copy down exactly where and what settings are changed by it? I am getting so many requests to install Paint.net across our network that I'm now at the point where I'm going to have to roll it out organisation wide or face being lynched. ;-) Thanks, Andrew
×
×
  • Create New...