Pogm

Thanks everybody for the help. After reading everything and doing some own research/image comparing, I found out that the older Paint.net (v4.3.x) must have used the Fant option. What I mainly use the program for, is to crop & resize images to a smaller resolution. I have a question if possible, so when enlarging an image ''Bicubic'' is the one to go for. And ''Fant'' when making it smaller. However lets say that I want to resize to a smaller image, and have the best quality with that. Would Fant still be a better option, or should I use Bicubic in this case? Even though Bicubic is mainly for enlarging, it might (maybe) provide slightly better quality compared to Fant. I did a comparison and couldn't spot much, but regardless of that I want to set it to the best quality preserver to call it like that, since I'm going to leave these options untouched after setting them.

Hello, the image resize box is different compared to before. I now have an option within the resize box called ''resampling'' and I can choose between Bicubic, Bicubic Smooth, Bilinear and 5 more. Before I didn't have the option to chose any of these, and there used to be something called supersampling if I'm right. Which one of these options do I have to select, in order to get the same resizing results/or quality as from before this update? (asking since these options weren't there before). And/or what did Paint.net use itself when saving images, before these resampling options became selectable. There is also another thing called ''Use Gamma Correction'' do I have to leave this on or off, to get the same image outcome as from before this option was available.