Cutter

OK, thanks.

OK, but Photoshop does it better, why?

Thanks, but I'm still wondering what's different with Paint.net's JPG implementation and how to improve the output files.

PNG is less efficient on high resolution pictures. I don't need such a high size file.

Hello, I've noticed that for a given file size, pictures saved to JPG by Paint.net seem to have a noticeably lower quality than those saved by Photoshop. Here is an example: Paint.net JPG image / Photoshop JPG image (notice that the file sizes are similar). I've used Paint.net's max setting (100), yet I couldn't get a decent colour on the orange text. What's the problem with Paint.net's JPG implementation? Or is there a problem only with this particular image? Thanks.