Blushock
-
Posts
11 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Blushock
-
-
I've looked, but can't find any documentation on this setting, and what the differences between the two options are. Could someone please clarify the differences, and when to use each? Thanks.
-
2 hours ago, Ego Eram Reputo said:
Move tool.....
.....and also image Resize
Oh I see I see. But in terms of those two, is one better than the other? I'd assume move is best for specific layers whilst image resize is for the entire canvas.
-
On 1/28/2023 at 2:56 PM, Rick Brewster said:
Bicubic tends to produces a shaper result, Anisotropic a smoother one. You'll see a bigger difference if you take a large image and make it much smaller (like 25% of its original size), and then toggle between the two.
Not sure abt the difference between sharpness and smoothness without going into circular definitions. Still, this is good info, and thank you for it. I can always just mess with each image's move tool setting and see if I notice a difference.
-
17 hours ago, BlastOfBN said:
Speaking of which, when anisotropic sampling was introduced, I used to get it mixed up with bilinear sampling, as I couldn’t tell the difference between the two (it’s still pretty hard to tell the difference to me).
What differences do they have?
Bilinear Sampling? Is that for a different tool?
-
Do these plugins work in 5.0? Any plans to create an official, optimized 5.0 release?
-
For the move tool, what is the difference between these two modes? I found no difference between image qualities when resizing with them.
-
For PNG images, what if you are using them on the web, or if you have a slow internet connection? Should you use interlacing then? And what does it actually do? I think it loads a lower quality version of the image before replacing it with the proper one, but I'm not sure.
Original forum (now closed): -
On 2/26/2021 at 3:50 PM, toe_head2001 said:
Interlacing doesn't affect the quality. It just changes the way the image data is stored within the file, and thus, how the data is loaded.
These days, with fast internet speeds, the image will load so quickly that you probably won't notice any difference between the two.
And if you're not even using your image on the web, who cares? The choice is non-consequential.
What if you are using it on the web, or if you have a slow internet connection? Should you use interlacing then? And what does it actually do? I think it loads a lower quality version of the image before replacing it with the proper one, but I'm not sure.
-
1 hour ago, AlexDolmatov said:
Read the first post. The version of the program is indicated there.
Install and test. Report the result. It's better than a question.Reread it, they don't explicitly say whether it does or doesn't. But still, worth a shot.
My guess is it will have a fair bit of issues compared to stable, but don't take that as absolute truth. After all, it's just a hypothesis. -
Do these plugins work for 5.0 and above?
Screen Tearing when Resizing
in Paint.NET Discussion and Questions
Posted · Edited by Blushock
specific monitor
Self-Explanatory, how do I prevent images from tearing when I resize them? My monitor is G-Sync compatible. Specifically, a Razer Raptor 27.