Rate the sig of the poster above you!

[B00k W0rm]

Drgrit, I think I like the colourful one more. Though the red one seems digital and appropriate for this age... Red one: 7/10. Colourful one: 8/10

[Kemaru]

YOUR SIG IS AWFUL

...LY absent.

[chrisco97]

Nice effects, but the left side is empty.

[ptuZ]

cool render, nice c4d's and good text. Good sig overall 8.5/10

[B00k W0rm]

YOUR SIG IS AWFUL

...LY absent.

Charming I'm going to get it changed once I can be stuffed creating a half-decent signature that doesn't make my PDN skills look like a hungover chimp on crack did it at 3:00 AM.

Ptuz, it's nice. do you think you could have the background contrasting with his armour?

Edited October 6, 2010 by B00k W0rm

[chrisco97]

YOUR SIG IS AWFUL

---

[Stone85]

Could reeally use some burning... and text

haha. great sig the c4ds look good. 8.8/10

[ptuZ]

cool sig with a nice render and some good text. good blending, 8/10

RATE:

[Stone85]

cool sig with a nice render and some good text. good blending, 8/10

RATE:

Halo sigs=way overused

The render is too bright and doesn't match the background, the sig could use some blending, the text looks pasted on, and the border is too distracting. I like the background, but it doesn't go well with a halo sig and it's not the same color as the purple render.

6.5/10

[yy10]

I've rated that before, but I'll add some more to what I said. Don't motion blur a background on a sig with a render/stock focal unless you're adding fractals and stuff and you've got a pretty bg and you set the layer to Addictive. The light source is quite umm... not very good and looks pretty random. Try adding light sources that blend with the render. For your sig, maybe you should make the right part of the render darker and the left part brighter. Then you can add a light source of the left part so that in blends in more. Cool. 7/10

omg i want a rating dis time

[ptuZ]

nice loos but i think it has the wrong dimensions... if it would have been like 150x400 or something ing would give it 8.5/10 now its 6/10.

RATE THIS:

kept the BG from my halo one but with a new render;

[csm725]

Don't motion blur a background on a sig with a render/stock focal unless you're adding fractals and stuff and you've got a pretty bg and you set the layer to Addictive.

[csm725]

ARG DOUBLE POST ARG CHROME 6

Edited October 8, 2010 by csm725

[yy10]

Hmmm..? I don't get what's the problem. But seriously, stop acting like you're the best and all, it's getting annoying.

[csm725]

You wrote Addictive instead of Additive. You still make better sigs than me.

[yy10]

You wrote Addictive instead of Additive. You still make better sigs than me.

=.= sure. But anyway, we make different kinds of sigs, so we can't compare our work with each other lol.

TPBM rate ptuZ.

[csm725]

You use Photoshop for your sigs, right?

[yy10]

Not for the sigs I post here. The ones you see on my dA are Photoshop.

[chrisco97]

yy10, love it. For a Paint.NET sig, it looks pretty awesome. 8/10

ptuz, decent. Still not adding any effects to the render.

--

Rate:

No c4ds or fractals used.

[Sfifer]

Just......wow......

that is really really good Chrisco.

Only thing i can see that could need some work is the font for "Ghost Recon" looks a bit Aliased and the light source is a tad too strong.

Still its amazing work. 9/10

rate:

again, i took the photo aswell, so 100% my work.

[Stone85]

such a great picture! 10/10, since it's all you

Edited October 9, 2010 by Stone85

[Sfifer]

i just looked at my sig and realised that you can only see the observation deck of the Kyoto tower, but not the tower itself, looks like a UFO. Cannot Unsee!!!!

Not your best work, but props to you for using the Star Wars font.

i cannot tell what the focal is actually meant to be, it looks like it was copied on from paper, if you know what i mean.

7/10

rate:

took this photo aswell

[D3T0N4T0R]

That looks cool, though I'd prefer it if there was a little more contrast in it.

8.5/10.

BTW, I like your guitar...

[ptuZ]

the text look quite wierd and the "bomb" is also not so nice, although I like the background and its has a nice "layout" (if you know what I mean)

5/10

[Mayor_McSteeze]

Interesting backgound, and text. The render could use some effects on it and not having a border is slightly annoying.

Neverless, 7.2\10

Please Rate: