Rate the sig of the poster above you!

[Mayor_McSteeze]

Hey its actually pretty nice. The diagonal lines add a nice touch too. Although i would prefer the white area to be some thing different. Perhaps Flips glass box tutorial could help?

6.5\10

Edited August 23, 2010 by Mayor_McSteeze

[Axle]

very nice and fresh (quite litterally) look to it, i like it but maybe the shadow shouldn't be quite so intense, it makes the grass look a tad funny. 8/10

>>>my newest one>>>

[h3llb0yn3cr0]

10/10 just for including a Stormtrooper

Don't worry, rate mine

[chrisco97]

I don't know how to rate your's. But since it seems like you are working on one, I will give you 10/10 for worrying about it.

---

Rate:

[Gamer_World14]

I like the overall focus of the signature, just not sure about how the other image overlays her head. I'd try to re-work those layers, so the head doesn't get that effect over her eyes. 6.5/10.

Rate my current sig please.

[chrisco97]

Thanks for the opinions, I appreciate them.

On your sig, awesome job! Way better than the last one. 9/10

--

Next Person Rate Gamer_World14!

[Axle]

for a logo, its good, but i don't like it as a sig though :\ 6.7/10 (as Sig) 8.9/10 (as logo)

[Musiphonix]

Great storm trooper. I like it. 8.6756559/10

Now someone can rate mine .

[ptuZ]

pretty nice though it needs some AA

6/10

RATE:

[chrisco97]

What I like about your sigs is how they are simple, but still have a great style to them. 8/10

Rate my current.

Edited August 25, 2010 by chrisco97

[Gazek]

Great sig. As I said in my pm, the sig could use lighting in only certain parts.

8.9/10.

Rate mine. And I know my avatar is acting up, I added a new one to match my current sig, but, things went haywire.

Edit: I fixed it. I uploaded it onto tinypic, then it worked.

Edited August 26, 2010 by Gazek

[Mayor_McSteeze]

Better then your last. Has a nice feel too it. Although the "glare" doesn't fit very well.

7.2\10

[chrisco97]

I love this one. It is so well done, and has nice flow to it. Your Halo sigs are always fantastic! 9.5/10

[Guest PsychoHarmonic]

first off....

7.666/10 for your sig (just cuz im not the big of a football fan)

i like your icon better (icon gets 9/10)

[Gazek]

Ok... I like the swirl... But the text kills it. Plus, it's too blurry. Kinda needs some work. 4.22/10.

You can skip rating mine.

[Raptor_101]

Hmm...not really interesting. Just keep on learning and you'll get better. 4/10

[Gazek]

Hmm...not really interesting. Just keep on learning and you'll get better. 4/10

Er, on whose? I said to not rate mine, it already got rated..

[flip]

It goes together pretty well, but you didn't really do much so 6/10.

[Sfifer]

i like it, but there is something about the fish that seems off, almost as if the contrast between the colours is too strong. Still its solid and other then that i can see nothing wrong with it.

9/10

please rate:

[Mayor_McSteeze]

First of all, i don't understand the obsession with putting diagonal lines in the background. Its quite annoying. (I see it everywhere but i just felt like pointing it out.)

Centered focal doesn't work in this case, doesn't blend well with the background, vignette is to strong, and the C4D's are rather flat. Now to pull away from being a negative Nancy,

The render is clean, Background fits nicely (except for the diagonal lines) and the text is pretty good.

6\10

[chrisco97]

Love it, but hate the blue color. 8.5/10.

[Gazek]

You've kept this sig for quite a long time. Text has some jaggy issues. 7.8/10.

[Mayor_McSteeze]

Interesting style, although there are lots of jaggies, and improvement from your last 2 sigs. The blue bar is a nice touch too.

7.2\10

Please rate this oldie:

Edited September 8, 2010 by Mayor_McSteeze

[Gazek]

Haha! Perfect old skool! Looks great and grungy. Now all that's missing is a black and white monser rising from behind the mountains .

Text really ruins it though..

9.8/10

[ptuZ]

like mayor said there are some jaggies but nice overall 8/10

Edited September 9, 2010 by ptuZ