Rate the sig of the poster above you!

[Fallschirmjäger]

Nice, how much of it was a stock?

If 100% PdN, outstanding! 7.5/10

I'm assuming the badges were stocks, if so could you link to the original image(s) used?

So if there were stocks, 6/10.

Nice BG too.

Here's the stock for the badges:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... twaffe.jpg

Colour was modified for one, and it was modified for the other.

[0(-.-)0]

Actually, if you say 100% PDN, it means its all PDN (I personally liked the sig though).

Anywho, Aguba. Amazing sig. Colours are excellent, I love the transparency and matching avatar, and the simplicity, style, and super-awesomeness rule.

10/10

[yy10]

It's too blurred. The edges are a bit too feathered. Not very good. 6/10

failure -.-

[chrisco97]

Actually, if you say 100% PDN, it means its all PDN (I personally liked the sig though).

Anywho, Aguba. Amazing sig. Colours are excellent, I love the transparency and matching avatar, and the simplicity, style, and super-awesomeness rule.

10/10

Thanks. I didn't really like it, I was just going to post and see if anyone else liked it. They didn't.

So, I am going for another new sig. I have been trying for a new design.

Next person rate yy10.

[Commadant J.]

I actually like it! Its nice in that tint. 8/10

[SkullSplitter]

Pretty cool, but I think you could have been a little more original with the cut-outs.

I also think it would be a good idea to blur the shadow a little bit.

Btw, I don't think you can have a [hide] tag in your sig. Take a look at rule 18. [link]

PBM rate:

[Commadant J.]

Kinda nice. Dont know how to do it. 8.

Rate my new Version.

[csm725]

A little interpretation doesn't hurt anyone. Try to be a little more original w. the cut-outs and interpretation on the tut:

...but I think you could have been a little more original with the cut-outs.

4/10

[flip]

It's good, just kinda boring. The highlight is a little blurry on the edges, too. 5/10.

[Skitzo]

nice, id give it a 7/10!

mine?

[csm725]

Umm, that's not a sig....

Anyhoo, 5/10

Nice flow, colors. Nothing special.

[iGreen]

8/10

It looks really simple to make yet you made it look amazing, I like that 3D/glossy look.

[chrisco97]

Cool, but the backgroud looks weird. 5.8/10

It don't match your name either

[iGreen]

Not really meant to suit my name, it's nightcrawler from X-Men, he's creepy, But I'm a fan of him

7/10 I'm also a fan of sonic and it has a cool feel to it, but it looks to boring.

[chrisco97]

Yeah. I always liked him. And it don't matter if it matches your name or not.

Next person rate iGreen

[SkullSplitter]

I like the background smudging, and the dots around Nightcrawler are pretty cool, but the render doesn't really fit there.

It looks like it's pasted on the image, but it should look like it's inside the image.

Also, the signature is too long IMO and the render is too far to the right. 6/10

Rate:

[hippotipus]

Skull Splitter 7/10 I like it but it doesnt really have much effect to it it seems like it's just the render

Plz rate mine

[Gamer_World14]

Very nice sig, although it seems that it would look better in a png transparent format. Then, I'd round the blue bottom edges and it'd look very sweet. But nice job, 7.5/10

I haven't been on the forums in a loong time, but just rate my old sig anyway.

[csm725]

I like. The 'G' on left side is great. Good touch. 7.5/10

[Sharp]

It's pretty boring. Colors dont match, seems blurry, reflection is also blurry. 3/10

[Skitzo]

hmm

love the simple text, and the clusters of stars. the color is brilliant also!

9.01/10 ; )

[pipp92]

colors are really too weird

5.5/10

rate:

[chrisco97]

Some of the parts are too plain. 6/10

Rate:

[Sylar]

8/10

I like the first one the best.

[SkullSplitter]

Pretty cool how you blended the images together but it could be better. The stuff in the lower left corner looks a bit out of place, for example.

Try working with renders; it's easier. Also, make the text bigger and use a different font. 6.5/10

Rate: