Rate the sig of the poster above you!

[Luther Keeler]

It's just glossy text but it's angled. 4/10 would be 5/10 if it was fully AA'd.

Mine is still a WiP, but is 100% PDN. (Except the text of course.)

[yy10]

Nice, but don't like the flipped effect. 7/10

Went c4d spamming because of the bad mood lol

[chrisco97]

Seems a little mixed up. I mean you can't really see the render. Or tell where the c4ds are. 6.5/10

[csm725]

Nice, reworked links are great. 5/10

Oh BTW, Luther Keeler, I beg to differ about my signature. I understand that you have an opinion, etc, but could you tell me where you see aliasing?

And I suppose I should rate Luther's because I commented on his post, so Luther's is 3.5/10. Don't like the bottom or the flipped effect. Yes, I'm a harsh rater.

[Soldier_Dude05]

I like the 3d-ness. It is a great demonstration of the power of pdn, and the power of your work. The only complaint Is that letters to me are just kind of plain. 7/10

Just made mine as of Feb/8/2010, hopes you likes!

[csm725]

Nice. Okay colors. The '05' could be better though. With the '05': 3/5/10

Without it: 4.5/10

I'm a harsh rater.

[SkullSplitter]

Good, but could be taller.

PBM Rate:

and

[chrisco97]

The first one is very dark. And just seems plain to me. 5/10

The second one, AWESOME! It isn't plain, and the c4ds nicely match the render. 8/10

[Sharp]

Hmm.. The background seems plain. Also the font doesnt really fit the render, and is misplaced. I like the fx on sonic though. 6/10

[Arbruteblade]

It's bright and colorful, it's not supposed to matter that it's plain, but I have seen better...8/10

It reminds me of a soda.

The chinese translates to "Happy Valentines Day" on the top and "2/14/2010" on the bottom.

[yy10]

1. I hate simplified chinese, traditional FTW! lol

2. Secondly, it's 二零一零年二月十四日

3. They're both very plain.

Nice job, 7/10

[jerkfight]

9.5/10.

The colours work wonderfully with the render imo. However i think a different text should have been used. Also the yellow on the right side is a bit too strong imo.

[0(-.-)0]

Beautiful. 9.6/10

[yy10]

It's too blurred. The edges are a bit too feathered. Not very good. 6/10

[csm725]

A little small, really packed. Too detailed for an (approx.) 350x100 sig. 5.5/10

[jerkfight]

7/10. Nice concept and all, but its a little boring...

[Bjarni]

Cool, but too small, colors are nice

7|10

Next person please rate these two:

&

[csm725]

Don't like Rosicky, I'm a Blues fan.

So 5.5/10. If I was unbiased, 6.5/10.

2nd - it's fine, nothing special, a little dark. 5/10

[Bjarni]

Meh, it's fine, colors aren't nice, but it's good

7.5|10

[Fallschirmjäger]

Interesting....could use a bit of work. 7/10

[csm725]

Nice, how much of it was a stock?

If 100% PdN, outstanding! 7.5/10

I'm assuming the badges were stocks, if so could you link to the original image(s) used?

So if there were stocks, 6/10.

Nice BG too.

Rate:

- Clickable thumb, feel free to download.

[chrisco97]

The background seems a little simple, and the overall feel is just plain

I like the light rays in the background though 6.5/10

Rate:

100% Paint.NET (Except for Render)

[csm725]

The render was made in PdN?

If so, 11/10! Not 12/10 because I don't like B&W sigs.

But really? I don't believe the render was 100% PdN. Clarification needed. If not 100% PdN, then, blech. 4.5/10

[aguba]

I'd say you did a nice job, 7.5/10

Take a look at the tutorial I put up, I think you'd like it. And who knows, maybe we'll have a re-run of that whole pyro-sig fiasco. I'm sure we all remember that

[chrisco97]

The render was made in PdN?

If so, 11/10! Not 12/10 because I don't like B&W sigs.

But really? I don't believe the render was 100% PdN. Clarification needed. If not 100% PdN, then, blech. 4.5/10

Sorry, the graphic site I came from, if you say 100% Paint.NET, it means that the effects were 100% Paint.NET. Not the render.

I edited my post. (Next person rate Aguba)