Sign in to follow this  
Tendercrisp

Rate the sig of the poster above you!

Recommended Posts

I like it. The fade into black on both sides is perhaps a little abrupt (maybe a more gentle fade), but its good. Maybe something more fancy than a white semi-transparent tag in the corner in terms of text. Very good however! 9/10 :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Holy cow. That is amazing. One of your bests. That is awesome. So plain, too. :wink:

Completely original, and I really don 't see anything wrong with it. COMPLETE 10/10.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty nice. Looks original. I like the arrows and the splatter but it doesn't have a focal and the text in the middle (if it is text) is very hard to read. Also, I don't like the border and the colors don't match very well. 7/10. But that's just my opinion. I've seen better sigs from you.

PS: thanks for rating mine 10. I feel so proud :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The render is fuzzy, and the double render looks off, plus the text doesn't fit, but not bad overall 7.5/10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice and simple, like the blue color and rays, but try adding flow into the image with some brushes, smudging, or something else to draw the viewers to some sort of focal point. Good job overall, 8.6/10

Rate:

Alfredo.jpg

and current

|

|

V

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nice and simple, like the blue color and rays, but try adding flow into the image with some brushes, smudging, or something else to draw the viewers to some sort of focal point. Good job overall, 8.6/10

Rate:

Alfredo.jpg

and current

|

|

V

Haven't both of those been rated enough? NEXT PERSON RATE GAMER_WORLD14

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ditch the white clouds and the border. Maybe add a bit of depth to it and also make the text smaller and slap it near the focal points.

8/10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooo, a little different this time, eh?

Though, that style of signature is getting old. Though the paint effects are nice, 8/10.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty nice. the splatter-like strokes could use a duplicate layer, Gaussian blur, move layer down treatment...=)

I like how it goes of the border, and how you did the text. 9/10.

Is mine better yet? =D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The block-like c4ds(?) overlaying the atmosphere is distracting. Maybe add a lens flare (I know there's a plug-in for it) at the edge of one of the mountains and it will be eye-candy!

EDIT: Woops forgot to add a score. 8.9/10!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see nothing has changed. Signature are susposed to be art and creative

Not some crappy thing you see over and over again. "It's to plain," or "this and this distract the eyes," or how about "NO flow/focal/text/depth." Nye

Okay, somebody tell me. Is this picture art? I see no flow, no focal, and most certainly no depth.

dada01.jpg

Give this a think will yeah?

Next person rate pride.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

About your post Minoeman, I know you don't need depth, flow etc. to have a good piece of art. But since we're supposed to be rating signatures on a fixed rating, there's not much we can do. I can give comments to all signatures in this forum saying that I can feel the artistic energy bursting from the canvas and to rate it 10/10 because everything is well, art.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I posted that for example. I'm trying to get everyone to start rating on Difference and originality.

Not the same thing over and over again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The overlaying text in the example picture is depth, because it adds a medium of dimension to the picture.

I understand what you're saying, it would be nice if comments were a little more specific.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The overlaying text in the example picture is depth, because it adds a medium of dimension to the picture.

I understand what you're saying, it would be nice if comments were a little more specific.

Exactly!

Edit: Topic moved to here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pure awesome. Would be even better if the orb extended past the rest of the image (-1), but it's right-aligned in a left-justified world (+1).

10/10.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not so original, not so good to look at, could have been done by a novice.

Just expected a little more from you.

This is an oldy from way back in the day. Rate:

fashizzlepop.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this