Rate the sig of the poster above you!

[K_I_N_G]

Not my choice of color, or particular design for that matter but it shows detail and promise. The text, perhaps if placed with the flow of the render would give it an overall shine too it. Focal's weird haha, just seems to be at a strange place.

I give it a, 7.5/10. Overall its fairly decent. Just thought I'd point out the things I didnt like.

Suddenly having an angel rush. Rate this and my current please:

[Pride]

The text is far away from the focal and the font doesn't seem to match. Maybe make it a bit more "angel-ish"

9/10

[Minoeman]

... My opinion still stands from my comment. If you took that picture, (Don't know who it is) it's 10/10.

Next person rate Pride!

[petewolfbane]

Nice sig, but maybe a little to bland.

8/10

rate:

[Chazizzle77]

Really good, little creepy though :wink:

9/10

I think your current sig is better though.

[hyrule]

pretty cool, especially if you made it. left side is a little dark though. maybe add some different colors as well, monotone looks.... too red. heh.

8/10.

rate:

looks better on a dark bg.

[boogster1]

**********!!!! (10 stars) Hyrule, I love your signature! That wolf's so mean, he hates pollution and stuff!! P.S. rate my sig below me.

[LFC4EVER]

6/10

It looks good. The simplicity is nice, but its blurry, which sort of ruins it. Also, maybe a gradient on the text, and an outline?

_________

New sig. =)

[Minoeman]

Nice picture. Did you take that picture? 10/10 if you took that picture, 9/10 if not.

(I have made a pledge to rate sigs based on difference, not similarity!)

[Juraiko1324]

Hee, abra! xD

8/10 for the idea and execution.

Soooo...mine now? xD (Not stolen! I made this for another forum originally, and my name is DEATH DEFYING... D:)

[Pride]

The colours could be a bit stronger but overall I like it actually! 9/10

Oh and, loldarklegacycomics! I play WoW too XD

[Chazizzle77]

It's a nice photo, and the background looks good.

If you took that photo, then 9/10.

If not . . . 7/10.

[SkullSplitter]

Chazizzle: Very nice! 9/10 Maybe you could add something shiny in the middle like a meteor etc.

Pride: A bit too empty in my opinion but the text is nice.

Yougoboom: Looks cool 8.5/10. I like it but I'm not sure about the two white lines. The font looks cool though. Can anyone tell me what it's called?

[Sharp]

pretty good, but the text doesn't look very good and the render doesn't really match the background. 6.5/10

[Zixchievous]

Sharp-8.5/10, The lines are quite cool, but the color of the shoe with the other bright neons I'm not quite sure about.

Rate both the attached sig and my real sig, please

[K_I_N_G]

You can still see some of the color from where the signature was originally rendered. Not very apparent, but can really drag down the quality of a signature (its worth the extra effort to work on the render).

1st: 6/10. Original enough, but not my flavor. Not very much effort into lighting or blending so it comes off as a bit of boring.

2nd: Nice abstract, the text isn't correct though. Not pleasing to the eye, does this abstract encapsulate you? A signature is posted after everything you say, generally it should say something about yourself. 6/10 for effort, but not much skill. Practice.

My apologies if that was too harsh.

Yes, I'm a fan of the chick-flick Twilight, so I made a signature:

[Juraiko1324]

9.8/10...that is almost completely perfect, though the displace could have been sharpened at the edges a little more. Yes, I iz pickeh D:

Mhmm, looks down there

VVVVVVVVVVVVVV

[K_I_N_G]

The splatter look is pretty cool, the black and white clouds in the bg doesnt quite fit with it though. Perhaps do a stone type of texture, like a grey background with the clouds set to overlay or a low transparency. Would bring out the splatter more I think.

7/10, its good but could use some color work.

I wasnt quite happy with the original so I made another:

[LFC4EVER]

7/10

Better, but get rid of the duplicated focal, you only need one, you've got 2. Not a good idea.

bg is all right, and fx are.. low. Add some more fx on top, try using effect c4ds and not just brushes.

Text is much better, you're improving a lot. Just change the colours so they blend with the sig better. Black and white text on a blue sig doesn't really make sense imo.

[Ouchy_S]

I love it! It looks simply amazing. Lovely colours, awesome effects, topnotch!

[Chazizzle77]

@KING: I don't like Edward Cullen . . . he's the reason boys these day's no longer have any charm, my girlfriend loves him

@Ouchy: I don't like the text, it's pretty distracting, but the rest of the sig is great.

8/10

Next person rate these two and my current please:

and

[K_I_N_G]

1: Thats pretty cool, looks like a sky texture. Perhaps a bit empty... 7/10.

2nd: Thats cool, looks like it was drawn on there. Give it a solid 8/10 for originality and pretty good execution. Perhaps the edges being cut off should be fixed though, give it a better outcome I think.

3rd: Could use some work, the planet look is cool but you only have a small part showing so it should be a little more spectacular. The edges of the planet seem to be bugging out or something. 7.8/10.

[LFC4EVER]

What i said before about the duped focal and the text still stands. I like this one more thought, its just seems more calmer and easier on the eye. Work with a smaller focal, or have a bigger canvas size thought. This one is almost square, most of your sigs are. If you've got a bigger canvas its easier to create depth as there's more space. Nonetheless, a healthy 7.5/10.

[Juraiko1324]

8.5/10, for the reason that I really think it's a *tinytiny* bit too simple.... :S

Although, I would love to know how all of you antialias these things so well D: The pics look sosharp! :O

[Juraiko1324]

8.5/10, for the reason that I really think it's a *tinytiny* bit too simple.... :S

Although, I would love to know how all of you antialias these things so well D: The pics look sosharp! :O

You know what, I take that back...I looked at it again, 9.4.. :S