Rate the sig of the poster above you!

[Minoeman 0]

It's nice, but to bright of colors around the edges but I like how they fade of the guitar. 8.69

Rate both of mine:

[TopHATslash 0]

The focal is blurry. Render isn't blended into the effects. Text is too big and distracting. The flow is pretty good, but it needs a lot of work. 6.8/10

[Sharp 3]

It's kind of bright, not a lot of flow. But overall, pretty good. 8.5/10

[Kemaru 44]

Your sig is pretty neat. It's very simple and neat yet it still has this complex look. The text could use some work, though. I'll give it an 8/10.

[petewolfbane 0]

wow nice job onn the colours and smudging, but the render is a bit to small for my taste and its to monotone.

still great job:7.5/10

rate:

[Kemaru 44]

wow nice job onn the colours and smudging, but the render is a bit to small for my taste and its to monotone.

still great job:7.5/10

rate:

The background is pretty good, but the render should be blended more into the background. You should also change the blend mode of those two Fragments.

E: stupid me, I forgot to rate it. 8/10 for this, 9-/10 for the v2. Good job.

[petewolfbane 0]

i followed your advice and here is the result.

[K_I_N_G 0]

The new one, 810. Its pretty good but the size doesnt really fit. 7/10. Looks like cracked metal and thats just cool. The color scheme just seems off though.

My newest sig guys, what you think?

[Masterlegodude 0]

8.6/10

It's pretty neat, it has a bit of high tech sort of look to it

[TopHATslash 0]

The text is blurry. =/ I don't like the overall mono of it. 6.7/10

----

Rate:

Render

Background

Its a different style. It is more of a photo-manip then my usuall style. I'm not liking the text, I think its a bit distracting, but I am pretty proud of it.

Note: This is not my SDOTY entry.

Edit: Why in the world is this such low quality. It really looks like this:

[JJgunz 0]

9.5/10 like a lot only thing i really can say needs a little change is maybe the text but it look dope

rate:

[Minoeman 0]

There isn't much to say but it's okay. 8.5/10

Rate:http://i461.photobucket.com/albums/qq333/minoeman/Noxussig2.png

[K_I_N_G 0]

Try duplicating the render, moving it about 5-20 pixels to the left and smudging the bloody potato out of it. Repeat on the right side. Should make it blend better with the background. Maybe a zoom blur at about 10 to make it flow. Try tweaking the color using luminosity on curves to make it stand out a bit more from the background. A different border may also help.

6.8/10. So you could make this signature 32% better and then it would be a masterpiece. (Remember people, the rating is between 1-10, not 5-10. Too many posts giving horrid works a 5 rating). My work isnt anything special, just thought I'd point out that being harsh on rating gives the person more understanding on what to do.

[TopHATslash 0]

Needs a lot more clouds to give it a grunge feel, and needs sharpening to make it feel realistic. The liquid is cool, though. Deserves a good 8.2/10. I feel it would jump to 9+ if you get a more realistic feel to it.

Rate: download/file.php?id=3596&mode=view

Due to low quality uploads of other sites, this is the only way that you can view it.

[Sozo 22]

It has an appropriately grungy feel, and good textures. And I like that shade of blue. I think it would be worthy of a 9/10.

[K_I_N_G 0]

10/10. Thats the best I think that signature can be. Maybe its time for a change though?

Updated my signature to THS's advice, what ya think?

[TopHATslash 0]

Still needs mroe adjusting. It doesn't give a real feel to it.. 8.7/10.. it's still better, but could improve.

Here is my go at what I'm talking about:

----

Rate: download/file.php?id=3596&mode=view

[ShK_828 0]

9.5/10

thats so awesome, the background and stuff

only if the resoultion was better ¬.¬

made a new sig ^^

absolutely 100% pdn

[TopHATslash 0]

Next time try to use alpha mask instead of magic wand. It needs more, too. But altogether, nicely done. 8.4/10

Rate: download/file.php?id=3596&mode=view

[pipp92 3]

mhh i don't really like it, the blue isn't matching or it is too strong, the walls are too near together, the sig has no flow and the render looks LQ, the text is ok. is it a tutfollower from sigresource ?

6/10

you did way better before

edit: oh i see the site before..

but i like your current. nice colors and good flow, maybe a little bit too blurry and bright

8.5/10

[TopHATslash 0]

I actually wrote that tut. :wink:

I'd say for yours, you need to blur the b&w render. It would give it an amazing jump in depth. 7.2/10

Edit: Also, a sig doesn't need to have a blurry background to have depth. If the focal is sharpened then your eyes will look at the focal before you look at the wall. I said it was more of a manip then an actual "Flow,depth,light" sig.

[survulus 0]

A pretty good gears 2 sig, I like the colour scheme, black, white and blue, though the actual image itself is a bit hard to make out... it's marcus fenix and... I dunno what else. But it still looks pretty cool. 8/10.

[TopHATslash 0]

Better quality version is here: download/file.php?id=3596&mode=view

The person below me, rate survulus.

[Gamer_World14 1]

@ survulus: I liked the lens glare thing that you added to the star to make it look bright, it looks pretty cool. One plugin I suggest you use for the stars in the background is called Sparkle. With this plugin, you can add even more of a glare effect to the final product which will make it look like more of a starry night. I also like the color choice of the sig, 9/10. Very simple, yet effective sig.

[Vito 0]

8/10. Not keen on the font for some reason, maybe use a more urban one to fit the rustic background - make it look more edgy