Rate the sig of the poster above you!

[RyuinfinityPDN 0]

8/10. Nice, but I can't see what all the fuss is about. The colors don't match!

[aeonix 0]

9/10

Simplistic, just seems too easy to make.

[rwp80 0]

10/10 amazing!

I've seen and checked out your stuff before. I wish I could do what you do!

[DarkShock 49]

7/10

kinda simple...

[aeonix 0]

8/10

Nice idea but everybody with video or anime characters kinda makes it old.

Yes,I know you are the original (Grandmaster Darkshock 8) )

[DarkShock 49]

8/10

Grandmaster Darkshock. Funny...

I don't understand your sig, but something about it is very artistic. Try giving it a border. (not necessarily the one I introduced to PdN)

[aeonix 0]

Thanks for the tip.

I shall also add the text "Craving Light"

[Fire_Ants 0]

Not exactly sure what it is, but it reminds me of those "splatter" modern art paintings. It looks pretty good. Could use a border, though...

Overall, a nice 8.5/10.

[Bronson-H 0]

Not exactly sure what it is, but it reminds me of those "splatter" modern art paintings. It looks pretty good. Could use a border, though...

Overall, a nice 8.5/10.

9/10 i like the way it all comes together.

&& my one in signature.

[aeonix 0]

6/10

I like it, but since LFC released that signature, everyone's been overusing the Winter Breeze brushes

[Fire_Ants 0]

6/10

I like it, but since LFC released that signature, everyone's been overusing the Winter Breeze brushes

Off-topic: I actually now just saw his tut that he made, since I've been wondering why people always say it looks like LFC's tut. I actually haven't seen many people with WB brushes in their sigs :\

TPBM: Rate aeonix's sig.

[scudder5000 0]

8/10. Good but could use a border.

Rate this please.

[LJXD 0]

6/10. Good work

BTW you won that Aussi3ies forum Photomanip comp you need to choose the next comp.

[pipp92 3]

the green doesn't match the other colors, and it's too blury

6/10

[Bronson-H 0]

7/10

Great way of blending it all.

[ez* 0]

Bronson I can't see your siggy. :shock:

I'll rate pipp's instead, 8/10, the glare on the top right is too bright.

[LFC4EVER 4]

8/10

The sherriff (sp?) badge and the wooden texture look really realistic! Great work on them, but your sig needs a border, and also there is a feel of emptiness on the left and right edges of the sig. Once those 2 points are sorted, it will me a 10/10 in my book.

[Bronson-H 0]

sorry i think i messed it up when i move my pictures around in my photobucket account.

But Lfc >>> 9/10 the way everything blends, the paint.NET logo and the realistic look of everything else looks fantastic.

[RyuinfinityPDN 0]

6/10. Just swirls. Please rate this:

[worldnewser 0]

Hmmm. The background of the new sig is actually one of your better ones. However, I think the text is a bit too plain.

8.3/10

[aeonix 0]

10/10.

Perfect.

But the error part scared the bloody potato outta me.

[007 Nab 0]

aeonix - I like it! - It looks like a modern splatter abstract - the glow fits it very well too -7.9/10!

worldnewser - really great concept on this one - I was figuring out an explosion with my current sig as well - I like the distorts and error as well. One point though, in my opinion, is that it doesn't really all flow. Either add in more frames, or speed the ones you have you have up a bit: That would certainly make it a 9.5 8)

[scudder5000 0]

9/10. Really good work. Very realistic.

Which is better?

Stacy Keibler V3.

Stacy Keibler V4.

[Aussi3ies 0]

In my opinion Scudder Stacy Keibler V3 is more appealing due to the font.

[pipp92 3]

i rated yours before

@scudder: i think v4 is better, because the text is better readable and the blue on the left side is better matching