Rate the sig of the poster above you!

[pipp92 3]

Good border, nice flow, but it's b&w

7.8/10

[scudder5000 0]

7/10 Just not feeling it.

Rate this and current please.

[St.Jim 0]

First one is a 7.9/10 - I love the antiqued effect (Coffe cup stains e.t.c) that makes it feel non-clinical.

I'm not such a huge fan of manga, but this looks great, the contrast of flat 2d and a nice background fits together well - 8/10

I hope that my Dad's army sig is liked.

[LFC4EVER 4]

8/10

I like the idea of the Union Jack in the arrow, and the flag has also been very well made! I don't have a clue about Dad's Army though, but i'm only 15 so yeah..

[brandon.roeder 1]

OMGZ ewww i hate it! Take it off now!!!!

haha just kidding bro. I love it actaully. 9.5/10

Can you pm me the font you used?

I like it

[jerkfight 17]

not bad, but its old try something new. 6.5/10

I know its to big but please rate

[scudder5000 0]

9.5/10. Meta knight kicks people. Kirby is better though. Makes want to setup the Super Nes and play Kirby superstar 8 games in 1.

Please rate and say which one is better

[LFC4EVER 4]

I like the top one more. The bottom one looks doesn't look as intensifying as the top one. Nice lightning effect too!

8/10 for the top one.

5/10 for the bottom one.

[K_I_N_G 0]

I thought your sig was simple before (posted in another thread) but I tried to recreate it using different text and pic and it came out terrible haha. Its harder than it looks, 10/10 (well for me anyway).

[PoisedMaverick 0]

7/10 I find it great!!!

But the part that needs fixing is the lighting. [Along with brightness as well.]

It's actually quite hard to see the render.

And that's a big aspect of a signature.

I have a new signature!

WHoot!

I doubt people will like it as much as my Rampage one, but I dunno.

[jerkfight 17]

its ok, but it looks kinda aliased... 6.5/10

V2.

Test Sig

[scudder5000 0]

9/10 great work. Who is that? Fox's evil twin?

[PoisedMaverick 0]

its ok, but it looks kinda aliased... 6.5/10

Test Sig

I kept it kind-a looking aliased because I though it helped support the motion sharpen I did on the arrows.

Blah, I don't know.

WOLF: 9/10

Everything looks nice, and I find the font apporpriate.

Mind telling me how you made the background blocks/design, assuming you made it.

Current: 9/10

Love the idea!

EDIT: To scudder's singature.

8.7/10

I like it, but there's just something about it that rubs me the wrong way. =/

[jerkfight 17]

I used a plugin called random shapes then I duplicated layer Gaussian blured with the selected selection. then transparent gradient.

[LFC4EVER 4]

@PoisedMaverick:

8/10

I agree with jerkfight. It is quite :AntiAliasingOff: , try feathering the edges or working on a larger scale with the same

ratio size, then you can resize down and the edges won't be so :AntiAliasingOff: . I like the idea though!

[PoisedMaverick 0]

Thanks jerfight!!!!

@PoisedMaverick:

8/10

I agree with jerkfight. It is quite :AntiAliasingOff: , try feathering the edges or working on a larger scale with the same

ratio size, then you can resize down and the edges won't be so :AntiAliasingOff: . I like the idea though!

I undertsand what you're saying, and agree to an extent.

Well, I tried both ideas, and both end up with extremely little, or no difference at all.

I think this has to do with the arrows themselves. They're from a brush pack, and they have some jittery missing bloches (sp?) from them. I could be wrong though.

Anywho, I love this signature LFC4EVER.

9.5/10.

I don't know what, but I feel as if something really small, or even a small detail, needs to be added to it.

Great job!

Mkay, so I did two versions of this signature.

Minor details changed: Bottom layers of renders blurred rather pixelated.

Pixelated:

Blurred:

Please rate both, as well as my current signature.

THANKS!

[pipp92 3]

I think it's better than your current:

current 6/10

the other-i don't see any differences :oops: 8/10

[K_I_N_G 0]

7/10, no idea who that dude is....

Two new ones, what ya think:

[PoisedMaverick 0]

pipp92: It's actually quite noticable.

@K_I_NG

1st: 7/10.

I like the effect of the gradient bars,

but the text seems too simple for the rest of the signature.

2nd: 6/10.

There is too much going on,

which ends up being too distracting to the render.

Good job on them so far.

Mkay, so I did two versions of this signature.

Minor details changed: Bottom layers of renders blurred rather pixelated.

Pixelated:

Blurred:

Please rate both, as well as my current signature.

Critiques is also very appreciated!

THANKS!

[GuhhtarrPlayyurr 0]

Pixelated- 7/10

Blurred- 8.5/10

Current- 6.5/10. Blur that one and it's a 9/10.

:wink:

[ordinary12 0]

7.5/10 It's ok, but kind of plain. I like the sketchy look of the hearts, though...

[iKid 0]

7/10

Interesting

Rate this-

[rasengan105 0]

9/10 well made with fantastic colors

[ordinary12 0]

9.5/10 Really sleek, I love it

[007 Nab 0]

I like your sig - you used some interesting plugins to achieve an unusual effect. It's different from other things I've seen on here.

However, unless you actually made it, I assume it is stock image-based. So I'm going to have to rate it a 7/10.

_____

My sig now has sharper text! (Yay I fixed it finally). What do you guys think of it?