Rate the sig of the poster above you!

[Fire_Ants 0]

Lol I have a lot of sigs that need a rating! Because I was on a tagging montage for a while.. there are some outta my style sigs in there but its alright!

Wow, lots of stuff to rate :shock:

1. 8.6/10, I like it. The big border on the left actually matchs now

2. Looks nice, but it is kinda boring. 8/10

3. Very nice. Although the top left corner seems kinda bare. Overall nice job. 9/10

4. Eh, it's ok. Like number 2, it is somewhat boring, but trying new things is always good 8/10

5. Second best one in this group. The only thing it needs is your name, and it's set! 9/10

Woo! Lots of ratings :o

[Mike Ryan 15]

Nice composition. It has a good sense of simplicity that masks the overall depth of work placed into the signature, something I strived for in my previous signatures and I believe is finally accomplished in my current. As well, the color range is limited and bars itself to some of the best color varieties. Perhaps the only complain I have is the farm house screen. Perhaps if that was removed and the tree screen placed on the left you would have one of the best signatures these forums have seen in a long time. For this peice, I give you a 9.5/10. As previously stated, the farm house just feels out of place and without it there it would leave the left blank. A few changes, and you will get my third 10/10.

To The Person Below Me:

Please note that the mountain range is only partial stock, and is composed of a terragen and the clone tool. Please rate accordingly, as I feel Commander Sozo rated my signature without that in mind.

[dawmail333 0]

9.5/10:

You gave it a fair bit of work, it looks great, and only the textureless mountains weren't PDN. If it was stock, I'd give you less.

[Mike Ryan 15]

Read my post. I said I used the clone tool. As I explained to Commander Sozo I could not find the mountain view AND the texture I wanted in any stock, so I terragen'ed a mountain view and used the clone tool to get an appropriate overlaying texture for the mountaints.

TPBM rate Dawmail's signature.

[drew 1]

Dawmail333, your signature looks pretty good. I don't quite know what the dots are, and the remind of Christmas lights and colors. Haha. Your text kinda reminds me of my old sig with the font and radial gradient. You did a pretty good job. I just think it could be better. The dots just seem a little bit too blurry for me.

7/10

[-Expiration- 1]

Minimalistic: nice and sleek. However, I'd like to see you tackle something more complicated, it seems all your sigs are alike. You have the skill to do it. 9/10.

[MIX_M@N 0]

:shock: :shock: :shock: :o :o *Realizes he could never do that*

Wow!

10/10

[worldnewser 0]

Whoa Orangey splash :o

Cool 9.7/10

--added new colors to my sig to liven it up a bit. Which I hope it did

[dawmail333 0]

It did, I'll say 9.5/10, it seems to have chopped edges.

Could someone rate this, as well as my current?

[Milkybarkid 1]

Ill give them both a 8.6/10, but I prefer the first one.

Here you go Max Power... v_v

[IceFusion 0]

I like your new sig, 8.5/10, blue is my favourite colour.

Please rate this sig:

[Klexon 0]

As you wish...

9/10

As for your actual sig, also 9/10

Wait, why do I keep posting below you all the time. Maybe you just pick the interesting ones..........................

[andROLL 0]

6/10

Clouds and overlay?

Maybe abit more effects?

Play around, and find new things you could do.

Still I quite like it, simple and sweet.

[Max Power 1]

Nice use of blending 7/10

MBK...I don't like the font and the boarder, but the flares are great. You only get a 8/10 because I know you can do better ones

[Klexon 0]

8/10

I find it a bit too dark. Other wise you could have got the other 2.

[dawmail333 0]

6.5/10, Interesting, but doesn't blend well at all.

TPBM, please rate both my current and this one:

[andROLL 0]

I think you should use your new sig, it has much more to it.

For the new one : 7/10

For the current one : 6/10

You could experience by playing aroundmore then learn to use more effects =]]

[jerkfight 17]

nice flow

colour is too bright

text doesnt match

nice idea

6.9/10

[Tsubouichi 0]

I like the ship thing but I think the starry background could use some more work. 7.5/10

[Tendou 0]

Can you rate my current signature and this? (Made 10 minutes ago)

[pipp92 3]

If the sig is 100% pdn is awesome if not, not. If pdn 9.5/10 if not 3/10

the other thing is too blue for me but still nice 7/10

[Motoko21 0]

@Tendou

Wow, very nice. I give them both a 9/10

[Champjev 0]

Wow everyone is getting really good at sig's I feel like a loser again lol... so much fun competition now, hope my works still has a impact!

Above: Meh... 5/10

Skip my rating and rate moto

[Fire_Ants 0]

Moto: Very nice. I love the splatters. 9/10.

EDIT: 200th post :o

[-Expiration- 1]

8/10, the house in the box looks out of place. It has vibrant colors and such while the other parts of your sig dont have a lot of saturation. Other than that, I love how it has a mysterious feel and the fogginess of it.