dpy Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 hi I read "Paint.NET Discussion & Questions">"Quality of resized pics could be better" I tried to test of resize because there was little doubt. Surprisingly,bicubic image quality is worse than bilinear. What two names were replaced? No, bilinear is undoubtedly bilinear. and ,I could not believe bicubic. I made a plug-in for test of bicubic , tried that. Image was the same quality as photoshop. bicubic equation is as wiki. I do not use special filter. What do you think? zip is "testimage.png","testresult.pdn","bicubictest.dll" file and cs file for Code Lab. Note of the source is Japanese. This is for testing. not a plug-in for the general public . After the problem is resolved, ZIP is removed." (2/22)Edit by dpy Quote my Paint.net site(Japanese)|my Paint.net youtube(Strange English/Japanese) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpy Posted February 22, 2012 Author Share Posted February 22, 2012 At first I am sorry that comparison expression was inappropriate. Because mystery was removed, this question is over. Probably bicubic of pdn uses LPF at the time of not only the reduction but also expansion. I guessed it from a test using CZP. If the developer intended it, this is not a bug or a trouble. By the way, I was four years using pdn, but hardly noticed it because I was using only reduction. thank you Quote my Paint.net site(Japanese)|my Paint.net youtube(Strange English/Japanese) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Brewster Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 I don't know but paint.net 4.0 will be using WIC's implementation of Bicubic. Not sure if the results are substantially different. Quote The Paint.NET Blog: https://blog.getpaint.net/ Donations are always appreciated! https://www.getpaint.net/donate.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpy Posted February 23, 2012 Author Share Posted February 23, 2012 Thanks for the reply. I had overlooked the important thing. Bicubic was not only one ! It is written in the wiki I showed． I tested the other bicubic. And now, I understood all. Also LPF was my delusion . I'm sorry. I look forward to pdn4. It is a fact no doubt. Quote my Paint.net site(Japanese)|my Paint.net youtube(Strange English/Japanese) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red ochre Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Why can't I report spam? - Logged in - obviously - - ah - spam removed already - they're good these 'mods' !! Quote Red ochre Plugin pack.............. Diabolical Drawings ................Real Paintings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoltBait Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Yes, I am! 1 Quote Click to play: Download: BoltBait's Plugin Pack | CodeLab | and how about a Computer Dominos Game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ego Eram Reputo Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Not only is BoltBait awesomely quick to recognize spam, but you should check out his games! I wasted devoted weeks to his adventure game & now Crazy8's has me hooked. Quote ebook: Mastering Paint.NET | resources: Plugin Index | Stereogram Tut | proud supporter of Codelab plugins: EER's Plugin Pack | Planetoid | StickMan | WhichSymbol+ | Dr Scott's Markup Renderer | CSV Filetype | dwarf horde plugins: Plugin Browser | ShapeMaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delpart Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 I dont know if I should report EER's post or not ... It's spam, but it's like the good Hawaiian kind of Spam; fried and tasty. Wait, now do I need to report my own post for being a bad follow-up attempt at humor? Quote *** Gallery at PDN-Fans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.