Sig Battles: Discussion

[Heat Stroke]

That should make it interesting! May the best sig win!

[Heat Stroke]

Rachel1995: you need to post the image code to your sig in your post.

4. The signature must be linked to in the reply (you can't say, "I enter with my current signature!")

unless i'm wrong and this sort of thing can slide. If that is the case, then I am sorry.

[csm725]

This sort of thing can't slide. Please make a new post with the link to your sig.

[Heat Stroke]

It looks like a snapshot from a movie for some reason. Then again, my eyes are horrible

Thats because it is the dukes of hazard dodge charger: stock

I tried to make the debris on the front of the car make sense, so I tried to keep some of the features of the barn in the sig. Dont know if any of it makes sense, but oh well.

[chrisco97]

Wow! You can't even tell it was a stock. Great work!

[Heat Stroke]

Ha, thanks!

[chrisco97]

No problem!

[mountnman]

one thing i dont get, in the rules it states the max size of a sig that can be entered, yet if someone uses that size it counts against them,

in my not-so-humble oppinion, an entry should be voted on by its composition and its execution, not because a couple of people "but i am everytime with smaller sigs, so:"

as for the rest, i understand that people will vote for the TYPE of sig they prefer, i.e. if you truely prefer Photoshop style sig, you will vote for one over another type, no biggy, its just that the size thing bothers me

[chrisco97]

It is a rule, and they should obey it. They can make a sig under the dimensions. It is not that hard to do.

[yellowman]

What about if both images are almost equal in composition and its execution? And it is hard to choose one of them? IMO, with a case like this we have to look at other minor features, as an example, if you check the sizes, Chrisco's is 88 KB and Heat Stroke's is 125 KB, and this is a good point to consider about it, because that will help the performance of viewing the site pages and save the bandwidth, especially for forum sites like this.

[mountnman]

It is a rule, and they should obey it. They can make a sig under the dimensions. It is not that hard to do.

the sigs im talking about WERE under the stated rule dimension, 500x200 being the rule

and as for as how many k-bytes it is needing to be lower you REALY dont want to visit the EA forums then- some of the sigs go several megabytes- but then we allow embeded video; and music on scrollover

[chrisco97]

Well, my sig is smaller in dimensions than Heat Stroke's, therefore mine is smaller in size. I personally think it doesn't matter the size, as long as they follow the rules on Page 1 of Sig Battles.

[mountnman]

that was my point chrisco, but to at least a few it does seem to matter-quite a bit, at least thats my impression

anyway its realy not that important, just a thing that bugs me, so i thought id fire it out and see what yall thought-- cheers

[Kemaru]

Yeah sorry about that, my laptop's screen isn't that great so I have problems with the brightness.

[Axle]

sweet, i won 3-0 . great

[mattz1996]

You should make a tutorial on how to do stuff like that, it's really neat. The sig you won 3-0 on and your current.

[Sfifer]

Could I point out that in my latest entry I took the photo aswell?

[chrisco97]

Well, nice work!

I would just like to see something different from you.

[mattz1996]

Ugh I want to enter my new sig so bad but no one will vote :\

[chrisco97]

You can now. Somebody has voted.

[Sfifer]

Yeah, I get what you mean Chrisco, all the sigs I've posted were made months ago. I havn't bothered to make any new ones yet.

[mountnman]

gratz sfifer, is a nice sig

as for as the "looks like a render pasted on a background. "

3 pics, 8 layers, 7 different effects plus the render..... yeeesh!

[jerkfight]

Good job sfifer

[Sfifer]

Thanks heaps Jerkfight, means a lot from you guys.

EDIT: oh no, I'm up against Chrisco, my winning streak may come to an end.

Edited December 30, 2010 by Sfifer

[Axle]

wow, im surprised about my second last win. wasn't expecting it.