Sig Battles (ENTRIES/VOTING ONLY)

[ptuZ 1]

agree with csm,

2 Weylin

0 L3RON

[chrisco97 3]

Weylin: 3

L3ron: 0

Honestly, weylin's has a nice use of background, and the border is nice.

L3ron: really plain, and you use some WIERD renders.

------

#winner Weylin

Edited May 16, 2010 by chrisco97

[csm725 8]

Okay then, I enter with:

[chrisco97 3]

I enter with this:

---

Winners:

0(-_-)0 - 1

yy10 - 1

PaintFOX: 1

CoolTEW: 1

Chrisco97 - 3

csm725 - 3

FrontCannon: 1

Mayor_McSteeze: 1

Pipp92: 1

Weylin: 1

Edited May 16, 2010 by chrisco97

[ptuZ 1]

allthough im not a sonic fan (xD) i have to vote for chris.

i think csm'sis to plain and i like the "feeling of motion" in chris's

csm: 0

chris: 1

Edited May 17, 2010 by ptuZ

[csm725 8]

Vote does not count until you give a reason. Feel free to edit your post and give us a reason, though.

[himself22 1]

MMS 1

GC 0

Edited May 16, 2010 by himself22

[csm725 8]

Ah yes, but that was before the rule was created. 

[himself22 1]

Okay.

chrisco97:1 (or 2 depending on if ptuZ changes his post)

csm725: 0

I think csm's is too simple, and the colors are messed up. But I don't really like the fact that Chrisco's doesn't have colors either.

Scoring could be wrong, next person who votes please check and if he changes it make the score 2 to 0 plus your vote.

[ptuZ 1]

sry

edited now

[birdhouse 0]

chrisco: 3

csm725: 0

I have to go with chrisco's here, because I thik it has great flow, and depth.

Csm, still nice, but seems a bit boring. You can do better.

---

#winner chrisco97

[csm725 8]

By chrisco's request imma enter with this:

[chrisco97 3]

And me with this:

Paper is 100% Paint.NET!

[warfighter67 1]

Oh look what it be? The two hosts battling it out?

I shall reckon that a score of..

Chrisco - 1

csm - 0

..Is now present.

Given the criteria that csm's clouds were made in PDN and are not renders/stocks I shall change my score.

Chrisco's fits well and blends nicely, and I love the paper.

[KevinB 0]

Chrisco-2

CSM-0

[csm725 8]

Please, give a reason. Score is 1-0 Chrisco.

[KevinB 0]

Well,your signature looks a bit boring to me,Chrisco's signature gets my point because I lve it how me made the paper.

It really looks like the text is really like it is in real when you write on a paper,frumble it a bit so it looks like it has been in your pocket a whike,You actually see the folds on the text

[csm725 8]

Mmmkay then, 2-0.

[Frontcannon 7]

chrisco97, the composition of your sig is bad. This time, it's csm725 that takes the cake.

chrisco97 - 2

csm725 - 1

[csm725 8]

Oh well, nice job. I enter with this:

[birdhouse 0]

I want to enter this:

[chrisco97 3]

CSM: 1

Birdhouse: 0

----

CSM, that is a brilliant sig. Very nice.

Birdhouse, I love that you used my tut, but CSM's is better.

[KevinB 0]

CSM-2

Birdhouse-0

I like the fact that it does have depth,that it doesn't look that plain and egalised,Just those letters give it the depth.Like they are like Letter bricks

Birdhouse doesn't have much depth in it(Only the border)

[KevinB 0]

Reply please,that way I can enter with my signature

[Spideroti 0]

CSM-3

Birdhouse-0

I really like the 3-D effect.

#Winner CSM