Sign in to follow this  
chrisco97

Sig Battles (ENTRIES/VOTING ONLY)

Recommended Posts

Rightz.

Chrisco gets it.

His is neat, cool, and effective. I think i've said this before, but musiphonix's doesn't bode well. To sharp. Are it could use some effects.

Chrisco: 1

Musiphonix: 0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Musiphonix, need to work on the AA, and really think hard before making a space sig because they just get old real quick (if they're not good!)

Chrisco, Not extraordinary, but it blends very well and the grungy feel to it is nice :lol:

Chrisco: 3

Musiphonix: 0

# Winner Chrisco

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mayor: 1

Psycho: 0

Psycho's the text doesnt fit and is monochromatic/low contrast which makes it look bland. Mayor's has just enough contrast, and overall looks clean

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mayor: 1

Psycho: 0

Psycho's the text doesnt fit and is monochromatic/low contrast which makes it look bland. Mayor's has just enough contrast, and overall looks clean

2-0 MMS

Psycho

Text 1/10

Blending 4/10

Compostion 2/10

Quality 3/10

Execution 4/10

Ttl 14/50

Comments - Bad quality renders, horrendous text.

MMS

Text 5/10 (Were you the one that couldn't d-load new fonts b/c of admin rights?)

Blending 5/10

Compostion 7/10

Quality 9/10

Execution 7/10

Ttl 33/50

Comments - Not my style... good landscape sig (still like mine better :D ).

Edited by csm725

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MMS wins! I'm not a big fan of the two lines though.

boltbait.mrgreen.png I'll use my current Mario boltbait.mrgreen.png

Similar to Darkshock's style.

Edited by Stone85

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

#winner MMS

Stone

Text 7/10

Blending 6/10

Compostion 6/10

Quality 6/10

Execution 8/10

Ttl 32/50

Comments - Some jagginess issues with the render. Good quality sig.

Psycho

Text 4/10

Blending 2/10

Compostion 3/10

Quality 3/10

Execution 4/10

Ttl 16/50

Comments - Too noisy. The duped-and-flipped render is a no-no. The render is waaay too distorted. The weird things in the middle of the sig have no relation. Did I mention too noisy? The text is a good concept but too big and a shame that it was ruined by the noise background. Good concept.

STONE 1-0

Edited by csm725

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys.

boltbait.mrgreen.png CSM- I think the jagginess you're talking about in my sig is the way I glowed the white outline on the bottom render. I wished I raised the softness and lowered the width on the outline, but that's just me.

CSM- It's not really my style of sigs--but I like it!

pTuz- It looks kind of plain to me. Maybe try using a smaller width but a similar amount of height. I started with 500x150, now I think it looks bad on the type of sigs I make (render sigs w/ c4ds) and I like to mix it up, but my favorite is 350x150.

CSM-1

Edited by Stone85

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CSM: 1

ptuz:1

CSM, your's is very nice, but it is basicly a wallpaper with shapes and lowered opacity. No offense, still one of your best signatures.

ptuz, you can tell you put work into this sig, it blends well, and it is overall great. I love the text.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

#CSM725: 2

#ptuZ:1

@CSM725, Right hand bottom corner needs a bit of work around the edges. I might have used the white transparent lines in a different manner for the final product. Didn't notice anything particularly wrong with it, has a good flow and a nice foundation.

@ptuZ, has a nice background and the placement of the render was great. Text is a little edgy and could use some transparency or shine to it so it doesn't look pasted on there. The render needs a bit more blending into the background. The render could use some more work. Good concept.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

csm 3

ptuz 1

simplicity. ptuz just had too much detail in the background, making it look cluttered. I don't like cluttered sigs. next battle?

it's ok to reuse sigs here right?

spacerendersig.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pdnnoob

Text 5/15

Blending 7/15

Compostion 8/15

Quality 13/15

Execution 8/15

Concept 7/7

Overall 15/18

Ttl 63/100

Comments - The text kills it (-10 on Text, -7 on Blending, -5 on Composition, -6 on Execution). Really bad. That's 28 points gone :D. Otherwise a solid space sig.

KING

Text 11/15

Blending 10/15

Compostion 8/15

Quality 10/15

Execution 10/15

Concept 4/7

Overall 14/18

Ttl 67/50

Comments - Too dark for me. Way too dark. However, brilliant text.

KING 1-0 PDNNOOB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like them both very much, but I'm going to have to go with Kings.

Noob: I like the colors, but I'm not wild about the text. Maybe you should've added a smaller planet and a moon to go along with it and smaller text. That's what I would've done.

King: Nice Sig! I'm not a big fan of the background, as I can see the renders face in it. That's a big nono. You should try rotating the render in the background so that you can't really tell that it is the main render. Hope that makes sense. I like the text and border. I don't really like the black and white; maybe you should try a gradiant map.

King- 2

Edited by Stone85

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

King - 3

PDNNoob - 0

pdnnoob, sorry I love the sig, but king's overall is awesome, blends well, looks like it was made in Photoshop with how well it is blended. Top notch signature.

#winner K_I_N_G

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this