Holly@Me Posted August 15 Share Posted August 15 I created an image using AI. I have since forgotten the prompts and it has been deleted from their database. So starting over isn't an option currently. My problem is the image is very pixilated. And I need it clear for printing. Is there any editing I can do while maintaining the beauty? I will be printing on a 4x6 postcard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solution Ego Eram Reputo Posted August 17 Solution Share Posted August 17 It's very pixellated because that's what happens when you print a smallish image at a high print quality. A good rule of thumb is: a reasonable quality print will have a resolution of 300 dots-per-inch. Based off your dimensions, you'll want a canvas approx 1200px x 1800px. Your 405px x 405px image isn't going to cut it no matter how you edit it, so recreate the image much larger. 1 1 Quote ebook: Mastering Paint.NET | resources: Plugin Index | Stereogram Tut | proud supporter of Codelab plugins: EER's Plugin Pack | Planetoid | StickMan | WhichSymbol+ | Dr Scott's Markup Renderer | CSV Filetype | dwarf horde plugins: Plugin Browser | ShapeMaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red ochre Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 I think there is something wrong with the fingers of her right hand? (to the left on screen)... perhaps everyone will look a bit odd in the A.I. future! 🙃 3 Quote Red ochre Plugin pack.............. Diabolical Drawings ................Real Paintings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tactilis Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 9 hours ago, Red ochre said: I think there is something wrong with the fingers of her right hand? (to the left on screen) I think you'll find that's her left hand 😜 (unless there's something very odd going on at elbow level). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red ochre Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 3 hours ago, Tactilis said: I think you'll find that's her left hand 😜 I thought that at first but it must be her right hand as the little finger is nearest the viewer. But who knows what the human anatomy of the future will be! 1 2 Quote Red ochre Plugin pack.............. Diabolical Drawings ................Real Paintings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pixey Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 1 hour ago, Red ochre said: at first but it must be her right hand as the little finger is nearest the viewer. I am now all bent up like a pretzel trying to work this out 🤣 At the end of the day, perhaps double-jointed is the answer. 3 Quote How I made Jennifer & Halle in Paint.net My Gallery | My Deviant Art "Rescuing one animal may not change the world, but for that animal their world is changed forever!" anon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tactilis Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 1 hour ago, Red ochre said: I thought that at first but it must be her right hand as the little finger is nearest the viewer. Ah, I see now. I had to ask my wife, who also thought it was the left hand, to adopt the poses (but without the wild hair) to check. 1 hour ago, Red ochre said: If her left hand then her thumbs should be facing the viewer? She has thumbs?? 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welsh Yellow Cheddar Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 2 hours ago, Pixey said: I am now all bent up like a pretzel trying to work this out 🤣 At the end of the day, perhaps double-jointed is the answer. Honestly, that is the first thing I did when I saw this post, I tried the pose myself and ended twisting my arms. I could not figure the arms position, left or right.😄 Some post are fun to hijack. Anyway, I have heard that AI does a great job enlarging images. It might add thumbs or correct the fingers positions.🙃 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apollo702 Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 After running this on through the formula, there were some slight differences in how the face and body came out. There still weren't any readily apparent thumbs either. It's a mystery. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyz Posted August 21 Share Posted August 21 Upscaling that image with paint.net or most paint programs will not add the detail you need. You would need an AI up-scaler to upscale your AI work and add detail! Better not to use AI tools currently though... they make small images and make mistakes 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seldenb Posted August 21 Share Posted August 21 While free AI generators like Microsoft's Image Creator or Meta's Imagine do tend to be limited to images in the vicinity of 1K or so on a side, you can subscribe to AI services which can generate much larger images. They all do tend to generate a variety of mistakes, though. It's not uncommon to have to generate a dozen or more to get just one that's close to being usable. And then a tool like paint.net can be useful to make the necessary fixes. 1 Quote Selden Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holly@Me Posted Thursday at 12:54 AM Author Share Posted Thursday at 12:54 AM On 8/16/2024 at 11:59 PM, Ego Eram Reputo said: It's very pixellated because that's what happens when you print a smallish image at a high print quality. A good rule of thumb is: a reasonable quality print will have a resolution of 300 dots-per-inch. Based off your dimensions, you'll want a canvas approx 1200px x 1800px. Your 405px x 405px image isn't going to cut it no matter how you edit it, so recreate the image much larger. Thank you so much for the information you have given me. I wish I could upload the PDF the printing site said was better on their end. I would love to get your advice on this one. But it is over the kB allowed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holly@Me Posted Thursday at 12:56 AM Author Share Posted Thursday at 12:56 AM On 8/21/2024 at 4:20 PM, seldenb said: While free AI generators like Microsoft's Image Creator or Meta's Imagine do tend to be limited to images in the vicinity of 1K or so on a side, you can subscribe to AI services which can generate much larger images. They all do tend to generate a variety of mistakes, though. It's not uncommon to have to generate a dozen or more to get just one that's close to being usable. And then a tool like paint.net can be useful to make the necessary fixes. Thank you. That is very good info. I do like the free sites, because like you said, you can generate a dozen or more just to get something close to usable. But maybe I can find a better option with all this new info. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.