Jump to content

Object of the Fortnight - Discussion thread.


Recommended Posts

Woodsy is occupied with other matters, so we had @Maximilian choose the next object. Maximilian has selected: Viking Ax.


I'm no Nordic historian, but from what I understand, a Viking Ax would be a Dane Ax or a Bearded Ax.

You could also look at the Google image search results for "Viking Axes"



  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way I see it - brushes and filters are tools to create the final product - just as plugins and shapes are used to shape or texture the art piece.

I consider all of them tools that users have access to in order to create artwork.


I didn't write the plugins either. Nor did I create the shapes.

Once I edit one of these brushes or textures - does it become mine? They all come in grey scale.


All work is done inside Paint.Net is my defense.


I knew it was a good question open to many forms of interpretation. Just setting the playing field.




Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Woot - @MadJik SO happy to see you post again!  I think of you every day :mrred: as I use so many of your marvelous Plugins.  Don't stay away now smileys-froh-256500.gif 


How I made Jennifer & Halle in Paint.net

My Gallery | My Deviant Art

"Rescuing one animal may not change the world, but for that animal their world is changed forever!" anon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey it's MadJik! Nice to see you here again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


On 5/29/2017 at 4:13 PM, Ego Eram Reputo said:

Subject proposal: a coin


It's my heavy burden (perhaps a slight overstatement) to select a new theme for the next round. While I think rendering a coin would be a interesting challenge, I see a problem. The main component of a coin is the head or tail image, and that seems like it might be little too drawing-intensive for OOTF. I think the emphasis should on using PDN, not on realistic sketching with a mouse (or for those that have one, a pen tablet ). So my inclination is to not choose a coin, but I could be convinced otherwise, and would be happy to hear arguments on either side.


(I suppose we could do the inverse side of a Canadian coin; then we could recycle our maple leaves.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the OotF #9, the Drinking Glass can be of any type (just be sure it's made of transparent glass, and used for drinking)

This list has some possibilities: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_glassware


It must be filled with a beverage (or at least a liquid). Don't fill it with solids... like marbles, pens, ect.


Maybe @MJW has more to add?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the glass should probably be appropriate to the beverage: a glass mug for beer; a wine glass for wine, a shot glass for whiskey, a tall fluted tumbler for Coke, etc. If you have a favorite beverage, that might be a good choice.


Provided they are normally associated with the chosen beverage, ice cubes, drinking straws, swizzle sticks, and miniature umbrellas are allowed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, MadJik said:

@Pixey Seems refreshing and tasty as a charm.

You post as I was preparing my first entry.


It's from "Inside" the glass so in the object. Is it ok?


Though I had in mind a more of less full outside view of a beverage in a glass, I like your entry, and see no reason to exclude it. I think for this particular OOTF  topic, originality and variety are encouraged.


While on the subject of entry acceptability, I want to mention something unrelated to your entry, but in regard to several entries from others in past contests. I don't want to be too much of a stick-in-the-mud (good luck with that!), but I'd like to remind everyone that the objective of OOTF is to produce a reasonably realistic version of the actual object -- not some stylized design based on the object, and not a different object that incorporates the theme object. That means no rainbow-hued Leroy-Neiman-esque renditions of a shot of scotch, and no martini-glass lapel pins. As toe_head2001 said in his introductory comments: "The object is to be taken literally. It's not meant to be interpreted." The entries to which I allude were generally attractive and well executed; they just didn't fit within the constraints of the competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • toe_head2001 changed the title to Object of the Fortnight – Discussion thread
  • Pixey changed the title to Object of the Fortnight - Discussion thread.
  • toe_head2001 pinned this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...