Stealth3si

Great! Can't wait for the next release. lol I think we were on the wrong page before. FYI, the article you posted seems to suggest that my problem was on a machine that had a Phenom II X4 960T and 'plenty of RAM.' My initial problem was actually on the Phenom X3 with 4 gbs of ram and a SSD. Please look at my original post. I originally asked if saving time would increase if I bought the new components in question. Otherwise, I got good news! I finally put together my new system, 8 GB of Ram. I'm glad to say there was a fair improvement in saving time, as well as opening time. Here is what happened on the old system: 16 sec to open 23 sec to save Now on the new system: 4 sec to open 7 sec to save

well shoot i just got my phenom II X4 960t. i haven't used it yet but i'll see if there will be any improvements once i put the system together...if yes, it better be noticeable or i'll be disappointed to have spent almost $300 to upgrade a system to gain zilch in saving time But if there's no significant improvement afterwards then I would like to use a different program. Is the PDN file universal and user-friendly when it comes to other programs that use layers?

well i've been told i am crazy numerous times.. they need to be kept separate because I generate graphics sheets which contain different objects... Has anyone found a way to decrease the save/load times?

about a hundred 1280x720 layers.should it be faster? though coz it's like sloooooww so your saying that it's CPU bottlenecked coz when i'm saving its nearly 100%!

It takes me 20 seconds to save a pdn file with many layers in it? From which component would I expect to see the most difference in speed if I buy the following components? Asus M5A88-V Evo AMD Phenom II X4 960T 3.0 Ghz (possibly unlockable to 6 cores) G.Skill 2 x 4gb Ripjaws 1600 memory 128GB SSD Crucial M4