Jump to content

Spm3

Members
  • Posts

    46
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Spm3

  1. Woah, it has been so long since I've been here. .-. I hope everyone missed me! TIME TO MAKE A COMEBACK!!! RAWR!!!
  2. Ah, I see. You guys have a soft-spot for realism. Lol
  3. Well if I am replying to someone's comment it isn't bumping then, is it? Anyway, I will stick with the way I am doing it now, as using hide tags and categorizing everything is much too tedious. I will eventually make a site showcasing all my graphics so that you don't have to swim through all the pages, but until I have more pages I will stick with my current method. Thank you for your comments, mate. EDIT: Made my own Skype icon.
  4. Ah yes, that was my "revolutionary" sig.
  5. Thanks for all your comments guys.
  6. Thank you. I have yet another creation: I call it "Simplicity". "Simplicity" with altered corners:
  7. You mean, "Sorry, I didn't know because I can't read". Anyway, Weylin: 2 PaintFox:2
  8. I've made some Google logos: I like the second one the best.
  9. By the way I did use motion blur, and zoom blur (on the background). I made the effects noticeable to draw your eyes to the coma (the head of the comet).
  10. There is no nebula, it is a comet.
  11. Made this because I wanted to attempt to make a spacescape without a tutorial.
  12. Thank you very much for your criticism, but what about the other one I edited into the post?
  13. Okay, I have had an ongoing conversation with Rick about problems I encountered using the beta PDN (that's version 3.5.5 I believe). For future reference: -I downloaded the beta version the first day it was posted on the old site. -My findings are all true, I even provided a screenshot of the bug and sent it to Rick in my first PM. -I did download the updated versions of pyrochild's plugins when using the beta (Yes, I did read that he said they were only compatible with version 3.5.4; I, turning out to be the beta tester, was curious as to how it would react. Now we know). Now, on with the PM conversation so you all know what has been going on. ~Weeks Go By~ Rick then tells me to post our PM conversation up here, so... yah. Please, if anyone can provide any insight it would be much appreciated.
  14. New image on the first post. And I have created this: http://i44.tinypic.com/2wnzcdf.jpg I like it. EDIT: Made this one too. http://i39.tinypic.com/wgvqqa.jpg I like it better.
  15. I don't know if anyone has mentioned this before, but I've found that a light Smart or Surface Blur can take out all or most of those nasty, low quality picture artifacts. Original: http://imway2fat.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/happy-chicken.jpg Smart Blur on default settings: http://i42.tinypic.com/10hrhnl.jpg Surface Blur on default settings: http://i40.tinypic.com/2uy3e5z.jpg Surface Blur has lower settings set at default than Smart Blur, but I've still found Smart Blur to be slightly better.
  16. Oooh, nice work on the newest art. Gotta love the gilded trimming on everything.
  17. Okay, here are two new backgrounds. The first one there I posted in the Desktop images section, along with my "Windows Vista" background (which was my first). The second one is the one I want to write a tutorial for (I honestly could never write a tutorial for the first one, it was just too difficult to make and the tut would be complicated as well). Magic: The Gathering; Divine Vs. Demonic Random Graphic Hmmm, now that I look at this again, it isn't tut worthy.
  18. The amount of effects is irrelevant, it is what effects you use. Also, there are 2 light sources in that signature, in case you didn't notice. One on the tip of his sword, the other in the corner. The one in the corner is for the lines, the one on the sword is for the render. No matter, that is a relatively old signature and I've improved since then. Your C+C is greatly appreciated, however. I even discovered a way to make an interesting background last night and am thinking about writing a tutorial! P.S. Can do about the broken link.
  19. Thank you. I know I have a LOT of signatures, but if you could provide some more detailed criticism on one or two that would be nice.
×
×
  • Create New...