Jump to content

atypicalcarl

Members
  • Posts

    64
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by atypicalcarl

  1. That's what layers and blend modes do. Place one image on a layer, another on another layer. Move each one around on the canvas separately using the tools. Flatten the layers when you're done.

    Play around and read the basic tutorials. Learn the intricacies, and you'll be a wiz in no time.

  2. I use lomography on sepia photographs, but that's about it. For most pieces, lomography only tends to serve as a frame. Art looks better in a frame, but digitally painting a digital frame for a digital painting is a step most of us aren't willing to take.

    The art will be framed when she has this printed and hung on the wall, and the two together will help to draw the eye where it needs to be. :D

  3. Thanks all for the encouragement, and the tips. I really appreciate them! Stormshadow - I see what you're saying. I'll work on the grasses behind the tub. I intended this to be a study in green, but I went back afterward and added yellow elements to fit the rule of thirds in an effort to add interest. I hope it worked!

    Oma, I'm afraid the butterfly is giving me fits. I could paint it, but rendering it is a different animal. I need to learn more about pdn.

    Don't we all? :D

  4. I usually save a single layer as a png, work on it huge, save it and reduce it, then import it back into a pdn file. My last painting was 2500 x 2000, 100+ layers. If I were painting it for sale, I'd need it bigger (at least 300dpi) but I get what you're saying. And I did read every post on your gallery. Several times. It's a great learning experience. :)

  5. ...and jitter is not fine enough to do it in this picture. I think if the terarrso tile was in rounded shapes I could have maybe added more texture to flower to reduce shine.

    Just a quick thought... but why can't you double the image size, run jitter, then reduce back to your original size? Wouldn't it give you finer control over the effect?

  6. Thanks, Mike! Colors are tricky for me - I'm mildly colorblind. I mix colors by RGB values. Otherwise it starts looking wicked heinous.

    PS - I LOVE your new sig.

    Edit: I neglected to thank goonfella (oops.) Thanks, man. I hope to get better at techo-realistic painting - or whatever you call it (3d modeling?) I'm working on a butterfly now.

  7. I agree with pyrotechniques, Mike: A surface texture on the backdrop would work wonders for the 3D effect and allow for an interesting variation in the light source, adding visual richness. Aside from that, I think the font is well-executed and and the colors are interesting. Forty-seven, forty-eight, forty-nine, fifty.

×
×
  • Create New...