surgency

Agreed. Its not very useful, and even if I were to do it there would only be a few people who ever use it. However, just for the record, it wouldnt be all that hard to do all those things, your list follows a singular format, so writing a program to extract all the authors names wouldnt be hard at all.

Okay well, whatever then. Ill set aside like an hour for clicking and stuff. Firefox's snaplinks plugins will be handy. But seriously, its not like these plugins are for cows, they are free (which of course is awesome on its own).

Yeah, thats true too, but still takes a lot of clicking. What about compiling a post/html page with direct links to all plugins, not the plugins' threads. Would that require authors premission/be against the rules?

No. That would require permission from every plugin author, and a huge time investment of whoever was in charge of compiling and maintaining the collection. It's been attempted before. Definitely no. MediaFire is horrid. I see. This would be very useful though. And yeah, I agree, mediafire does suck, at least it has lately, but its the first host site that came to mind. Thanks for the quick reply.

Thanks so much, after reformatting, ive lost all of my PdN plugins... Any chance of this being compiled into a single .zip file (hosted on mediafire or the like?)

oh... thanks then. PdN 4 seems a little far away still though.

oh... thanks then. PdN 4 seems a little far away still though.

i havent been active for a while, but i still use PdN. So, i really like using paint.net for making brochures, so i propose creating a "text layer" feature in this type of layer, all text would remain text, and remain editable btw, i did use search, didnt find anything. but i dont believe that nobody had thought of this

i havent been active for a while, but i still use PdN. So, i really like using paint.net for making brochures, so i propose creating a "text layer" feature in this type of layer, all text would remain text, and remain editable btw, i did use search, didnt find anything. but i dont believe that nobody had thought of this

Alright I guess I'll be first. You know what? Compression kills.

i think that the first post is a great idea the shift click = add nubs also sounds great but the best idea in here is that we could use another tool, and then edit the same line (or text) i think it was contributed by boltbait

so these bots are actually useful right? because if they collect information for google (well only the google bot does) and then somebody searched for making a wave or something this forum will be linked to right?

@ janettsue i dont think oma used bulge. i think she used lens. Bevel helps you make the frames that were in oma's picture (look on the very left and youll see a brown line @swistak looks good also looks like some sort of candy

@ Fisherman's Friend That is, if PdN doesn't get sold to google before 5.00

oh so there were no people pretending to be monkeys and posting bad things? and doesnt spam mean meat? or better yet Stupid Pointless (help me out here with an acronym)

Alright. I know this isn't a very popular subject around here, but: I missed the entire spam thing. What happened? What "monkey attack"?

Weird... is it the multi-colored "hahahaha"s? Yeah it the hahahahaha thing You can see the blue line of hahas at the top

cant you just use resize and turn off maintain ascpect ratio and just change the width? yeah, the tires will be squished but sometimes it will look quite good

Why can't i edit my last post anymore? Anyway, I made a bunch of sigs mostly for fun. Are any worthy enough te be my forum sig? 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Just kidding.. 8. By the way, (@pyrochild) i used the render human effect for #8. 9. 10.

I like the spinning orb. I've been away for sometime. Can somone catch me up on what happened? All i can tell is that the forum got spammed (how can you spam a forum?) and cmd cleaned it up. Then we switched forums because of the spam. Or because something else. And did anyone else notice that at the top, the PdN logo has a white line around it? Oh, and did i miss the quick reply thing or does it not exist anymore?

Oh, I looked a little but I didnt find that it was already reported. And I knew that the second one is not a big deal. I just came into the Bugs section of the forum for the first time and decided to check the announcments.

This is not a major error in the program but anyway: I understand that the max. brush size is now 500. But when you type in, say, 501 (anything more that 500), the box turns red and when you scroll over to the little arrow next to it, it says: Brush size is more than 100. Shouldn't it say 500? Also, I would like to point out something that is wrong on the forum (this is aiming at Rick). In the annoucment on this forum (the second one : http://paintdotnet.12.forumer.com/viewtopic.php?t=32), it says Shouldn't it say Paint.NET 3.10 Beta 2 or whatever version. Or do you not include beta's on the announcment? And shouldn't there be a comma after "Paint.NET 3.08"?

yea yeah, ive had no tv ever since my sister went into third grade (i was in first, but i skipped kindergarten) my computer in my room has been there every since i was in third grade but almost always since then its been 100% useless because it has no internet and my account does not have administrative privalages only thing i do on it is... paint.net! and, before i can hang out or watch a movie ive got to do like 15 pages of math that my dad uses on job interviews to get into microsoft then, i have to play piano a lot, and then read like 300 pages (in russian). im not complaining because i know how much all that math is going to help me when i grow up (especially if i want to get into microsoft. hehe) but it would be nice to let me have a little freedom EDIT: also, you got any feedback/critisism about my pics?

Im grounded so i cant be on the forum much. Anyway, im making my mom a website for her music group. Here are some of the images i am considering using: thats the same conecept as the second one but it doesnt have a gradient layer also i made something just for fun: if you want instructions then just use steganography 3-bits on this (i did this mainly for fun). i think i will change my sig soon to something like the first image i posted (in this post)

Well, it is just it wont be automatic. If you dupe the normal picture and then reveal, you get the same result. That was more of a suggestion to boltbait for a 1.2 release or whatever it will be next