avada

I guess it's a decent workaround.

Hello! Old thread, but the issue is the same. I pretty much never used it. It was always a nuisance. When I open paint.net not directly with an image, I have an image on the clipboard, which is useless to paste on the pre-determined sized canvas. I always need to close it and then open it again. Otherwise I may want to drag&drop an image, in which case the default canvas is also of no use. I think it would be more productive if paint.net would show a few basic options, without creating a canvas. Such as, create canvas from clipboard image (dimmed if no image on clipboard), open image, create new canvas, maybe recent images option. Allowing people to chose what they want to do instead of presuming they want an empty canvas, with the size pre-set.

Hi! I just wanted to perform "image adjustments" that affect the whole image anyway (didn't select anything), and was wondering how to apply it to all layers, but apparently I can't. It's quite a nuisance for this use-case. I have to perform the same action for each layer. Which can be a lot.

Hi! It seems like paint.net doesn't handle something properly anymore. When I make changes from a saved image then undo it I get a warning for unsaved changes, which is not the case. Works the other way around as well. I undo something from a saved state, then re-do I also get the warning.

You would with 6000+ posts... I made those 27 over years, when I had something to ask or talk about. Usually I only remember what's wrong when I'm locked out. And as you pointed out the forum lies twice. First that I can use the e-mail, and second that I used the wrong password, which also implies that he username was fine.

The forum login lies and that alone eats up the three tries... I just mentioned the other as a potential issue. I'd say 5 is more the norm, from my experience. Also, usually other logins are nice enough to warn me after the first failed try that I have four tries left. The measures should be in sync with the value of what it protects as Joshua points out. The forum could force everyone to buy custom hardware keys and take fingerprints from everyone via a security firm while also mandating a 100 character password x number of letters-small-and-large/numbers/special characters. And lock out on the first failure, so you need to personally appear at whichever country/address to restore your credentials (after exhaustive biometric and DNA testing of course) How could you think compromising this level of security for convenience and monetary reasons?

Yes, this. And also the same is displayed on the full login page. Also the 3 tries are needlessly few. This not some website that's a target to hacking. There's no money in hacking an account. You missed my point. My usernames vary across websites so I don't always know which one to use on websites I don't visit frequently. (Especially if I can't use any of my favored ones). Also the length of the e-mail address doesn't matter because it's in the form history, since it's a commonly used for logins.

So what's the state nowadays? Is lossless JPEG editing still not possible?

Hello! Since I didn't see any dedicated website bug section I post here. This really sucks. I always get screwed by it. I naturally enter the e-mail because the username is necessarily variable. (It may be taken...) By the time I figure out why can't I log in I'm always locked out from the forum, because there's only a mere 3 attempts. (As if this is web bank login or something.)

Thanks.

But what if I have full layer, and I only want to make transparent a selected area of it?

I didn't think this topic would stoop to etymological research. But anyway, it's really cumbersome creating extra layers then removing them. Well, that's that then. Consider this a feature request then.

That's more of a workaround, that doesn't solve the problem

Hi! I often find it to have a great negative effect on the image I try to view/edit. Especially if it has fine details.

I wouldn't say all, but it's common. Doesn't help with the buttons on the right though. Not if they're covered by one of said floating windows.