nadav

Rick, Thanks for (creating such a great tool and for) replying and looking into this. Integer boundaries is understood, and is not the issue I am trying to raise. What I meant, is that with fixed-ratio it is quite common to start the selection (mouse drag-point) outside the image boundaries, but to still expect that the actual selected pixels will conform to the fixed-ratio. PDN currently calculates the ratio from the mouse drag-point, instead of from the image start-point. This leads to the actual selection not being in the correct ratio. In the screenshot below you can see that PDN describes the selection as 400x400, where in fact the actual pixels selected in the image are not 400x400, and do not conform to the 4:4 ration (no, I don't know why I did 4:4 ratio instead of 1:1 you can make fun of me later).

I believe that fixed ratio is slightly harder to do per Djisves detailed instructions. The whole point of fixed ratio is to have the selection be in the (wait for it) specified ratio PDN is a great tool that I use daily - I was so excited when the upgrade came out last week - but with respect, the fact that its "always been this way" does not mean that it's the best behavior. Maybe there is a use-case I am missing, but what is the advantage of starting the selection outside the image boundaries?

This happens to me as well, when I select outside the canvas edge (4.0.9). Selecting outside the canvas is the easiest way to ensure I am selecting the "entire" corner. Photoshop handles outside-canvas by only "counting" the pixels within the image - is there a reason that Paint.net starts the "count" from the starting mouse-position even when outside the canvas?